Jlash Posted March 5, 2019 Share Posted March 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, TedLavie said: still lacking votes from @Jlash @PR @WFLukic @Hockey5djh @SwoleXmad and @Ragnarok If 9+ votes are one option 1 and 2 (basically 4yr deals for rounds 1 to 4 or 5), I will ask the people who voted elsewhere to re-vote on these two options I'm still working my way through the 27 variations of 1 topic to vote on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Im going to go yes for 1-4 because it makes more sense in comparison to IRL rounds as 5&6 are 3rd round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Nah keep it as is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Yes to 1-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 43 minutes ago, PR said: Im going to go yes for 1-4 because it makes more sense in comparison to IRL rounds as 5&6 are 3rd round. Ironic from the one guy that was the only person to vote for changing rounds 5-7 to 4 years last year. I'll go ahead and switch my vote to the 1-4 year version as that is likely what is going to pass in the end as the least amount of change version. Getting rid of 5 year 1st rounders is the main goal that needs to happen. @TedLavie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 25 minutes ago, SirA1 said: Ironic from the one guy that was the only person to vote for changing rounds 5-7 to 4 years last year. I'll go ahead and switch my vote to the 1-4 year version as that is likely what is going to pass in the end as the least amount of change version. Getting rid of 5 year 1st rounders is the main goal that needs to happen. @TedLavie I know. I didn't factor in the every draftee hitting FA at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Just now, PR said: I know. I didn't factor in the every draftee hitting FA at the same time. As Ted has said that doesn't really matter as you have multiple guys from multiple draft classes hitting FA at the same time the way we do it now. Half of the people that I draft aren't even around by year 4 if they don't produce so you can find ways to keep the ones you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringinDaPain Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 12 hours ago, BringinDaPain said: 15. Yes but for Rounds 1-5 at 6-7 still 3 years. Change of Vote YES BUT ONLY FOR Rounds 1-4 / keep rounds 5+ to 3 year deals @TedLavie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Vote yes to change the first round to 4 year deals. @TedLavie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 6, 2019 Author Share Posted March 6, 2019 1st rounders will get a 4 year contract. Only one vote needed to keep 5th rounders on a 3yr deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 hours ago, TedLavie said: 1st rounders will get a 4 year contract. Only one vote needed to keep 5th rounders on a 3yr deal Sign me up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 4 hours ago, TedLavie said: 1st rounders will get a 4 year contract. Only one vote needed to keep 5th rounders on a 3yr deal You really don't need a vote to keep something how it already is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 On 3/5/2019 at 3:06 AM, TedLavie said: Argument for : Standardizing the Contract years of Drafted players to 4 years removes a lot of the need for corner case rules. @TedLavie Can you explain to me what a "corner case rule" is. Maybe i'll understand your push for the rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 On 3/5/2019 at 7:14 AM, TedLavie said: Only valid argument I heard was Ruskie's (I think) in the sense that yes the current structure basically gives a bonus to the owners who use their 1st rounder well as the money allocated to those players is less than IRL So its "Corner case rules" vs an added benefit of drafting better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 On 3/5/2019 at 11:04 AM, pheltzbahr said: For anyone voting no to reducing 1st round to 4 years, this is something that will eliminate any issues with 3Ups going forward. I get wanting to lock in a first rounder on the cheap for a 5th year for YOUR team, but is it worth it to eliminate the headache that arises on outlier situations for the ENTIRE league? This will make the 3Up rule IRONCLAD in application and basically on autopilot. I think I wrapped my head around it....The dumb way to describe it is as follows: If we reduce all rookie first round contracts to 4 years it will mirror NFL contracts, therefore BDL teams are making decisions on 5th year options and 3ups at the same time as the NFL teams meaning that the contracts they would sign would mirror their IRL contract length exactly and the term would only differ due to the BDL 3up discount (75%). If that is correct I'll vote, if that's incorrect or not the intent of the change please let me know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.