ET80 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1. Gopher 2. Naz 3. Mwill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Bcb his approach is very similar to when he’s scum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: OK I'll let you slide on that. But why not block a killer? If I realized he could use both of his 2-shot (and a 3rd from malf's move) on the same night I probably would have. Assuming it was one hit I think letting it go through and seeing what we could learn from it would've been better. Orca also hinted at blocking dome, fwiw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 Counselor Squire Nazgul MWil In that order at this moment in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 2 hours ago, James said: So rackcs and tk3 are cleared unless tk3 is lying, in which case both of them would probably be mafia. Woz suspicion being mostly about role selection seems a little weak. If we want to guarantee that we can lynch him I can make that happen for tomorrow though. I don't see how tk3's statement implicates me in his business at all. I think tk3 might be mafia and made up that whole bussing thing with me and matts to try to make himself seem more town-ish. And if you think the Woz think is only about his role selection then you straight up have not been reading. 1 hour ago, MWil23 said: I was basically already cleared by rackcs. As for Counselor, I've already stated I'm skeptical of him and feigning anger at you and gopher for not voting after night was called. I wouldn't say you're cleared at all. I think that your action does seem town-ish but it doesn't clear you. 1 hour ago, bcb1213 said: And this @Tk3is why speed lynching never helps cause we have zero way of confirming this Yeah, I was over zealous yesterday in speeding through the dome lynch. I've learned the error of my ways. 24 minutes ago, squire12 said: @Danger maybe this will shed some light on why i placed a vote on Rackcs. I don't think it really sheds a light at all tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: OK I'll let you slide on that. But why not block a killer? it is interesting that there were 3 role blocks and none were able to block the killer on N1. Though, if scum has a role block, they would be able to role block the other role blocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 minute ago, rackcs said: 29 minutes ago, squire12 said: @Danger maybe this will shed some light on why i placed a vote on Rackcs. I don't think it really sheds a light at all tbh @rackcs Did you want players to test to see if someone would be lynch proof? I placed my vote on you to do just that. it is a 2 step process to follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rackcs Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 minute ago, squire12 said: @rackcs Did you want players to test to see if someone would be lynch proof? I placed my vote on you to do just that. it is a 2 step process to follow. Yes but there have been multiple vote counts since then showing I could so I thought that wasn't why you did it. Plus nobody else was going for it anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: @rackcs Did you want players to test to see if someone would be lynch proof? I placed my vote on you to do just that. it is a 2 step process to follow. I still contend that Whicker would announce or at least acknowledge that the person could not be voted for after the conclusion of N2. If I'm being honest, it's a bad look, and your reasoning is probably even worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, rackcs said: I don't see how tk3's statement implicates me in his business at all. I think tk3 might be mafia and made up that whole bussing thing with me and matts to try to make himself seem more town-ish. And if you think the Woz think is only about his role selection then you straight up have not been reading. I wouldn't say you're cleared at all. I think that your action does seem town-ish but it doesn't clear you. Yeah, I was over zealous yesterday in speeding through the dome lynch. I've learned the error of my ways. I don't think it really sheds a light at all tbh Would scum really use an additional move on someone they hit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, rackcs said: Yes but there have been multiple vote counts since then showing I could so I thought that wasn't why you did it. Plus nobody else was going for it anyways. If we're down to try - everyone unvote. I can test three people at a time, see what official vote counts look like after I drop my three. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Ragnarok said: Tracking anyone N1 is a low probability shot. And Flacco wasn't high on my scum list at that point. Is he any higher on the list now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, ET80 said: If we're down to try - everyone unvote. I can test three people at a time, see what official vote counts look like after I drop my three. Thoughts? What’s the point of unvoting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 18 minutes ago, squire12 said: it is interesting that there were 3 role blocks and none were able to block the killer on N1. Though, if scum has a role block, they would be able to role block the other role blocks. Mafia roleblock cant roleblock the roleblocks, bc all roleblocks shoot at once 12 minutes ago, Danger said: I still contend that Whicker would announce or at least acknowledge that the person could not be voted for after the conclusion of N2. If I'm being honest, it's a bad look, and your reasoning is probably even worse. I agree with this completely and squire is rapidly moving up my list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Orca Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Whicker said: Day 3 1. ET - McCree (Split Triple Voter) – Flacco** (102), Tk3*** (102), Woz* (103), Squire** (108), Flacco*** (108), Woz* , Gopher**, Mwil*** 2. Gopher - Lucio (1-shot Multiple Loverizer) – Fin (102) 5. Tk3 – Pharah (Bus Driver) – Counselor (108) 7. Flacco – Zarya (Non-Consecutive Doctor) – Gopher 8. Rack – Widowmaker (Watcher) – Flacco (102), Woz (103) 10. Woz – Mei (2-shot Lynchproof) – Rag (101), Flacco (104) 12. Fin – Junkrat (Vengeful Vigilante) – 14. Danger – Reinhardt (1-shot Multiple Roleblocker) – Woz (105), Counselor (109) 16. Rick – Mercy (1-shot Governor) – Gopher (106) 17. Rag – Hanzo (Tracker) – 18. Mwil – Zenyatta (Loverizer/Haterizer) – Rag (103), Squire (110) 19. James – Winston (Odd-night Jailkeeper) – 20. Bcb – Moira (Strong Loverizer) – James 21. Naz – Reaper (2-shot Commuter) – 22. Touch – Orisa (1-shot Vote Motivator) – BcB 23. Counselor – Baptiste (1-shot Multiple Governor) – Gopher (105) 24. Squire – Soldier 76 (Vanilla Townie) – Rack (104), Gopher Vote Count (9 to lynch)1 Woz – Rack1 Flacco – Woz 5 Gopher – Counselor, Pickle, Squire, Flacco, ET1 2 Counselor – Tk3, Danger 1 Squire – Mwil 1 Fin – Gopher 1 James -- BcB 1 Mwil -- ET3 1 Naz - ET2 1 BcB -- Touch @The Orca This is official VC up to now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.