Jump to content

Death Note Mafia: Mafia Wins! (Counselor, Nazgul, Swag)


Malfatron

Recommended Posts

With 17 players, it's 9 vote to lynch.

dingo - 5 (forge, counselor, james, squire, et80
dome - 3 (mission
pwny - 1 ( rack
mission - 1 (dingo
Ted - 1 (dome
forge - 1 (woz
ragnorak - 1 (mwil
naz - 1 (bcb

james - 1 (Ted
 

didn't vote:


 @SwAg

 @Ragnarok

 @Nazgul

 

Vote or die:

@pwny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:

Because while you have given me a townie vibe, I am certainly not going to lockclear you for that claim.

Im not expecting you to lolclear me. I’m expecting you to question it with a point that makes sense.

Quote

If anything, it does cause me to be a bit more suspicious because it is such an easily fake-able claim and we have no way of verifying it.

Correct. But you were mostly concerned because I was on the vote... which makes zero sense.

Quote

Part of that suspicion comes from your immediate hedging of the result.  The whole bit about how there could be roles to screw up your result.  It came across as getting out in front of someone flipping scum when you claimed them as town.

It’s called transparency 

Edited by Dome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dome said:

Im not expecting you to lolclear me. I’m expecting you to question it with a point that makes sense.

Correct. But you were mostly concerned because I wasn’t on the vote... which makes zero sense.

It’s called transparency 

So you thought some of it made sense and some didn't.  Okay.

Nah, that's not transparency.  It looks like hedging.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TedLavie said:

What's everyone thoughts on James?

He hasn't provided much aside from (quality) commentary. He's kinda there, but is happy to stick to a very limited scumhunt focused on ET posting restrictions, Dingo being weird and mission having 3 votes. Seems a bit lazy/scummy imho

@Ragnarok since you're on, what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bcb1213 said:

So both rags and swag like squire.  That's intriguing 

I already explained my thought process on it.  But, I guess, Ragnarok is going back now.  Probably because he shook that I figured him and squire out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TedLavie said:

@Ragnarok since you're on, what do you think?

So I just read through James and there is jack squat there.  I don't think he has made a serious game-related post or vote the entire game.  All his votes have some joking element to them and as far as I can tell, he has given no real thoughts.  But there are a fair number of posts.  So it does look like hiding in plain sight.  

I could vote him today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:

So you thought some of it made sense and some didn't.  Okay.

Nah, that's not transparency.  It looks like hedging.  

No I explained with logic why it didn’t make sense and you never replied. You disappeared.

Then you showed up today saying it made sense and haven’t actually tackled my explanation for why you’re wrong. You still haven’t, because you can’t.

My argument is factually correct and yours is absolute garage.

And no.... it’s definitely transparency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Ragnarok said:

The one major issue I have here is that you are on the lynch as well.  

 

21 hours ago, Dome said:

why is that an issue?

 

21 hours ago, Ragnarok said:

It acts as a self clear.  And you could have a scum buddy on the lynch and get both yall clear for a bit.

That said, you are someone I think is very likely townie, so I'm inclined to trust the result.  I just personally wish you weren't on the vote list.

 

53 minutes ago, Dome said:

It’s exactly what happened. 

You gave your reason for concern. I explained why it was no good with actual logic.

Read it again if you’re confused about why your concern belongs in the trash.

 

 

44 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:

It was a supplemental point.  The main point being that it is an easily fake-able role.  That said, I've gotten a pretty townie vibe from you all game, so I am inclined to believe you.  

I think that's what I said last night.  Although I don't entirely remember.  

 

Ragnarok.

 

it WAS NOT a supplemental point.

it was your ONLY point

and it sucked so you ran away, then came back today with a new story 

 

RAGS RAGS RAGS 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dome said:

No I explained with logic why it didn’t make sense and you never replied. You disappeared.

Then you showed up today saying it made sense and haven’t actually tackled my explanation for why you’re wrong. You still haven’t, because you can’t.

My argument is factually correct and yours is absolute garage.

And no.... it’s definitely transparency.

I was drunk last night.  It happens.

Not sure what I haven't discussed, but okay.

You are welcome to your opinion as silly as it may be.

No, it's not transparency.  It would be transparency if you knew those elements were in the game.  It's speculation at best here and hedging at the worst.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...