Jump to content

2019 MLB Hot Stove Thread


Eagles27

Recommended Posts

the Red Sox' asking price remains sky-high when discussing potential Mookie Betts trade scenarios with other teams, per Buster Olney of ESPN.

Olney reports that the Red Sox are willing to trade Betts but only if another team is willing to give them two top-flight prospects and also take David Price and the $96 million he has remaining on his contract. Betts will make $27 million for 2020 in the final year of his contract. That means another team will have to pay $123 million and give up their two best prospects to get one year of Betts and three years of a declining David Price. The Red Sox are trying to avoid escalating penalties for exceeding the luxury tax and they are unlikely to get under the threshold unless they can find a way to shed Price's salary, which may only be made possible if they sweeten the deal by including Betts.

https://www.rotoworld.com/baseball/mlb/player/20029/mookie-betts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, flyguy1609 said:

the Red Sox' asking price remains sky-high when discussing potential Mookie Betts trade scenarios with other teams, per Buster Olney of ESPN.

Olney reports that the Red Sox are willing to trade Betts but only if another team is willing to give them two top-flight prospects and also take David Price and the $96 million he has remaining on his contract. Betts will make $27 million for 2020 in the final year of his contract. That means another team will have to pay $123 million and give up their two best prospects to get one year of Betts and three years of a declining David Price. The Red Sox are trying to avoid escalating penalties for exceeding the luxury tax and they are unlikely to get under the threshold unless they can find a way to shed Price's salary, which may only be made possible if they sweeten the deal by including Betts.

https://www.rotoworld.com/baseball/mlb/player/20029/mookie-betts

This sounds like the kind of thing you leak so that your owner thinks you're trying to get under the luxury tax when in reality you couldn't give a **** about the luxury tax.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ramssuperbowl99 said:

He's under contract for 8 years. What "leverage"? About all he can do is be moody about the situation.

unless im missing something this is wrong. Hes under contract for essentially two more years and if hes that unhappy he opts our, or threatens to. Josh Donaldson just got 100 mil (almost), arenado should easily surpass that in 2021 so even if you think it was an overpay and he doesnt get as much, he should be in the neighborhood of what was left on his deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...