Dome Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 I don’t think touch is scum i think he would’ve found a way to admit he was wrong and move on if he was I think he’s picking up where he left off in meme mafia, but town Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted January 7, 2020 Author Share Posted January 7, 2020 VC touch - 3 (josh, whicker, n4l n4l- 3 (counselor, daboyle, mwil daboyle - 2 (slappy, dome, orca - 1 ( et80 josh - 1 (matts pickle - 1 ( squire counselor - 1 (blah dome- 1 (orca whicker - 1 (bcb et80 - 1 (pickle didnt vote: theuntouchable kingseanjohn wolfeyestrk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, squire12 said: Can you quote or give a reference tot he defensive aspect to this? He puts a picture of Nic Cage holding a book. He says “lol k” when I call for votes. Overall dismissive tone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, Whicker said: They literally are different though. That’s the point. The burden of proof is on your side my friend No, they are not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 1 minute ago, squire12 said: How is this a dliemma? Player A sees no correlation between nic cage character and role, player B sees a fit Not overly uncommon in these theme type games IMO It may not have been but it’s turned into one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Just now, theuntouchable said: No, they are not. Lol k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: How is this a dliemma? Player A sees no correlation between nic cage character and role, player B sees a fit Not overly uncommon in these theme type games IMO Because I said “I wouldn’t say my role fits precisely” which somehow makes it an entirely different statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 5 hours ago, Malfatron said: VC daboyle - 4 (slappy, whicker, dome, mwil n4l- 2 (counselor, daboyle josh - 2 (matts, josh orca - 2 (n4l, et80 pickle - 1 ( squire wolf- 1 (daboyle, counselor - 1 (blah dome- 1 (orca whicker - 1 (bcb et80 - 1 (pickle didnt vote: theuntouchable kingseanjohn wolfeyestrk 0 votes on touch at this point 3 hours ago, JoshstraDaymus said: Touch Josh drops the first vote on touch 3 hours ago, Whicker said: Touch 3 hours ago, Counselor said: I haven’t read up yet but just seeing Josh hop on any train again lol How is being the first vote on someone hopping on the train? @Counselor can you explain this thinking here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, Whicker said: You claimed I just jumped on Dome’s reasoning because I didn’t do it within seconds of your posting. Then, you claim I’m an active party in twisting your words. Either I was active and not just jumping on, or I didn’t actively twist your words. So no they cannot coexist YOU are the one that said you voted me “first thing after it”. I pointed out that there was 8 posts in between my statements and when you voted me. yes, you can hop on someone’s faulty reasoning and then actively attempt to twist words. Those two statements can coexist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 1 minute ago, squire12 said: 0 votes on touch at this point Josh drops the first vote on touch How is being the first vote on someone hopping on the train? @Counselor can you explain this thinking here? He hopped on it when it was mentioned as an option. So quick to do so after he had been doing it several other times on other players 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: No, they are not. This is annoying. I don’t even think you’re scum, I just think you’re too stubborn to admit when you’re wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Also, take notice of n4l quietly moving on to my lynch line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: YOU are the one that said you voted me “first thing after it”. I pointed out that there was 8 posts in between my statements and when you voted me. yes, you can hop on someone’s faulty reasoning and then actively attempt to twist words. Those two statements can coexist. So which one is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingseanjohn Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Orca Someone give me a tldr of the past 16 pages Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted January 7, 2020 Share Posted January 7, 2020 Just now, Counselor said: He hopped on it when it was mentioned as an option. So quick to do so after he had been doing it several other times on other players I’m following counselors reasoning here i’d 100% go josh I was on josh early this game. If you’ll all remember I drunkenly nailed him N1 it is more than a little odd that the first time I really sink my teeth into someone else he’s there to follow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.