Jump to content

FFMD II ‘20 - Detroit Lions Front Office


TL-TwoWinsAway

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said:

I'm a sucker for players like 65 and 38... short-term, long-term, whatever-term. Considering our roster, I think it both fills a need and gives us another dimension, especially considering what happens to the position next year.

I also love the thought of 21 and 16. Truly can't go wrong there, either.

If any of those picks fell to #35, I feel like we'd be running up to the podium with their name in hand. (I mean, not literally. I don't think they do that.) I just think it's insane to leave this draft with Okudah and one of those players... players that can legitimately evolve their position for this team.

I think 21 does what needs to be done for the defense.

cant agree more about your reasoning for 65 and 38

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said:

Honestly, if you'd all rather not, I get it completely. We could wait until #24, on the clock tomorrow, and keep one of the 2nd round picks. I'm good with it. I just... there's a lot of talent in those four numbers.

I think the 4 options elevated another position group. That’s what the lions need impo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said:

Honestly, if you'd all rather not, I get it completely. We could wait until #24, on the clock tomorrow, and keep one of the 2nd round picks. I'm good with it. I just... there's a lot of talent in those four numbers.

This team needs talent.  The further you get from the top of the first, the bigger the percentage of bust.  I could be swayed both ways easily.  I think I'll stick with the trade up and take my lumps later if they happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lionized said:

I think the 4 options elevated another position group. That’s what the lions need impo.

Yeah, and LionArkie pretty much said this same thing. I feel the same way. If we walk away with 21 or 38/65, I think we're in a significantly better position than if we did not. We'd still add a player at 13's position in round 3, as well as a BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...