kurgan Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Chieferific said: I guess I'm more comfortable with our backups for position F. Kindley helped that position too indirectly. I'd go K then H. Giants pick goes thru, I'd nab 201. While I get that logic, I will say that all are FA... one might retire since he is older and doesn't need to play, and the other two have done nothing to prove they are NFL starters. That assumes we move the one guy, although he has shown he can play, he is also a FA. So, of the 4 available bodies to play those two spots, all are FA after the season, and two of those 4 are totally unproven. 113 or 110 could 'redshirt' a year and develop and take over for the guy that might retire, or at least be in the mix. Sorry... I am just not a fan of 201. I know he fits our system, and he is better than our last year's pick, but his injury history and one year production scare me. I mean, I wouldn't be mad, but I am just not sure what he is actually going to do in the league. It is good value for him... but I would almost rather take 10 or 17 at 183 and flip someone from that spot on the roster for an extra pick... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Snack Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 do we still have a trade on the table to get pick 150? i think it was moving hilton and a 7th for pick 150ish and a 6th? if 29 is still there at that pick i think that is the move Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, kurgan said: While I get that logic, I will say that all are FA... one might retire since he is older and doesn't need to play, and the other two have done nothing to prove they are NFL starters. That assumes we move the one guy, although he has shown he can play, he is also a FA. So, of the 4 available bodies to play those two spots, all are FA after the season, and two of those 4 are totally unproven. 113 or 110 could 'redshirt' a year and develop and take over for the guy that might retire, or at least be in the mix. Sorry... I am just not a fan of 201. I know he fits our system, and he is better than our last year's pick, but his injury history and one year production scare me. I mean, I wouldn't be mad, but I am just not sure what he is actually going to do in the league. It is good value for him... but I would almost rather take 10 or 17 at 183 and flip someone from that spot on the roster for an extra pick... The drafted backup is a FA in 2022. I wouldn't argue much if F is taken instead of 201. Mainly because there are already so many bodies at that position. But I really like 201 for us. Certainly K before F and tho an UDFA H will prolly be there, I'm still leaning towards H over F. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurgan Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 9 minutes ago, Big Snack said: do we still have a trade on the table to get pick 150? i think it was moving hilton and a 7th for pick 150ish and a 6th? if 29 is still there at that pick i think that is the move They are waiting till they are OTC or close. As much as I like 29(or 67) I would take 113 here, if we get the pick. 3 minutes ago, Chieferific said: The drafted backup is a FA in 2022. I wouldn't argue much if F is taken instead of 201. Mainly because there are already so many bodies at that position. But I really like 201 for us. Certainly K before F and tho an UDFA H will prolly be there, I'm still leaning towards H over F. Good to know... he is still unproven, although I am hopeful and he played well in the two games he had to last year. Gun to my head, I would take H over F here, BUT... there are only two F's I like and both are certain to go sooon, IMO. I think that one of the H's I like will still be around at 183. We need both slots, I think, so I hope we make the Hilton deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 1 minute ago, kurgan said: They are waiting till they are OTC or close. As much as I like 29(or 67) I would take 113 here, if we get the pick. Good to know... he is still unproven, although I am hopeful and he played well in the two games he had to last year. Gun to my head, I would take H over F here, BUT... there are only two F's I like and both are certain to go sooon, IMO. I think that one of the H's I like will still be around at 183. We need both slots, I think, so I hope we make the Hilton deal. That will be a big help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cbrunn Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 (edited) 50 is a legit top 100 prospect And if the trade, I feel like he has to have consideration Only 3 under contract next year, need bodies there way more then at the 60- or 200s Especially at that value Edited April 10, 2020 by Cbrunn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 11 minutes ago, Cbrunn said: 50 is a legit top 100 prospect And if the trade, I feel like he has to have consideration Only 3 under contract next year, need bodies there way more then at the 60- or 200s Especially at that value While I agree L's are needed, we have 3 K's on the roster and start 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted April 10, 2020 Author Share Posted April 10, 2020 (edited) We have zero Fs under contract next season Edited April 10, 2020 by jebrick 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, jebrick said: We have zero Fs under contract next season I don't that's true. We have 1. Not that it's much better. Edited April 10, 2020 by Chieferific Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebrick Posted April 10, 2020 Author Share Posted April 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, Chieferific said: I don't that's true. We have 1. Not that it's much better. and how will you feel if he does not win the RT job ( when Feiler moves to LG)? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, jebrick said: and how will you feel if he does not win the RT job ( when Feiler moves to LG)? Feiler stays at RT. Kindley at LG. Personally, I would expect the current player to be better prepared to take over then a late Rd Rookie from this Class. Edited April 10, 2020 by Chieferific 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cbrunn Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 24 minutes ago, Chieferific said: While I agree L's are needed, we have 3 K's on the roster and start 2. Sorry I suck with codes We Usually carry 6? If we trade Hilton, you're down to 4 you absolutely need at least 1 more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chieferific Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Cbrunn said: Sorry I suck with codes We Usually carry 6? If we trade Hilton, you're down to 4 you absolutely need at least 1 more I don't disagree it's a need. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cbrunn Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Looks like Tampa Bay? Just made dj humpries available I know it's not realistic, but maybe worth a shot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigben07MVP Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 24 minutes ago, Chieferific said: Feiler stays at RT. Kindley at LG. Personally, I would expect the current player to be better prepared to take over then a late Rd Rookie from this Class. It's a leap to expect Kindley to start at LG week 1. My week 1 vision is Villy - Wis - Pouncey - Decastro - Feiler Chuks - Kindley - Wis - Kindley/Gray - Banner That leaves us a lot of flexibility. If Pouncey gets hurt, you could slide Wis over to C, Feiler to LG and Banner at RT. Or just slide Wis inside and inset Kindley at LG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.