squire12 Posted August 8, 2020 Author Share Posted August 8, 2020 42 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: So would a change happen before the 2021 draft so people still cant keep more than 3 QBs? Like how does this work? I dont love that eventually you run out of starters. Doesnt happen really with other positions bc so many teams have 2 RBs used or 4 WRs I think we could consider a specific week of the season change and a have it be prior to the weekly waiver processing and if we do FAAB. I am not even sure if we do FAAB for waivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 7 minutes ago, squire12 said: I think we could consider a specific week of the season change and a have it be prior to the weekly waiver processing and if we do FAAB. I am not even sure if we do FAAB for waivers We dont do FAAB for waivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted August 8, 2020 Author Share Posted August 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: We dont do FAAB for waivers ok.... so scratch that plan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winitall Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 (edited) I say that we do something similar to this year where we vote on rule changes after the season but before keeper locks. That way there is no add/drop to add a 4th QB before the draft. If someone really wants to trade resources for a 4th QB and then use 33% of their resources keeping 4 QBs next offseason, that’s their decision. That’s assuming a rule change would even pass. Edited August 8, 2020 by winitall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 6 minutes ago, winitall said: I say that we do something similar to this year where we vote on rule changes after the season but before keeper locks. That way there is no add/drop to add a 4th QB before the draft. If someone really wants to trade resources for a 4th QB and then use 33% of their resources keeping 4 QBs next offseason, that’s their decision. That’s assuming a rule change would even pass. Complete side bar but I thought we were upping keepers next season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winitall Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 4 minutes ago, Lionized said: Complete side bar but I thought we were upping keepers next season. I believe our plan is going to be similar to what I mentioned above for the QB max, to discuss/vote on it. I know when it was brought up this year that there were a lot of different viewpoints so maybe after a year we will get a little more consensus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 3 minutes ago, winitall said: I believe our plan is going to be similar to what I mentioned above for the QB max, to discuss/vote on it. I know when it was brought up this year that there were a lot of different viewpoints so maybe after a year we will get a little more consensus. Okay good deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winitall Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 Great pick @HvacRaider. I really might regret taking Burrow over Jeudy after moving up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 Kind of surprised Jeudy fell to 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted August 8, 2020 Author Share Posted August 8, 2020 14 minutes ago, winitall said: Great pick @HvacRaider. I really might regret taking Burrow over Jeudy after moving up. 1 minute ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: Kind of surprised Jeudy fell to 9 I was happy with either of Jeudy, Reagor or Burrow. Moving back worked out well. Now to see how these careers turn out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: I was happy with either of Jeudy, Reagor or Burrow. Moving back worked out well. Now to see how these careers turn out I like it, I think getting Burrow was nice too but I can see why trading down worked. I do think Reagor is 3rd on my list for those 3 though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 @Bigbear72 your breaking my heart my friend nice pick 😆 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HvacRaider Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 23 minutes ago, winitall said: Great pick @HvacRaider. I really might regret taking Burrow over Jeudy after moving up. Lol i was ready to take burrow and shocked to see the trade and pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted August 8, 2020 Author Share Posted August 8, 2020 5 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: I like it, I think getting Burrow was nice too but I can see why trading down worked. I do think Reagor is 3rd on my list for those 3 though Fair, I think Reagor is being a bit slept on in the WR group. He could see a pretty good target share in PHI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted August 8, 2020 Share Posted August 8, 2020 Just now, squire12 said: Fair, I think Reagor is being a bit slept on in the WR group. He could see a pretty good target share in PHI I'm just a huge Jeudy fan is all. His team might have too many mouths to feed. Reagor should get his but the TEs will take a huge chunk too plus Miles Sanders will get alot of work everywhere. Should be interesting at least. Despite how I had him ranked, he was the obvious choice at 10, didnt mean any disrespect by it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.