Jump to content

Pro Day/ Combine testing times:


Ozzy

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jeezla said:

Robinson is probably the best slot CB prospect over 5'10".

Not a knock on Robinson specifically, just saying I've heard this literally every day for the past two weeks about several guys a day who aren't really pegged as top 50 picks.  Some of them will be, but it's a lot of talk this time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, THE DUKE said:

Not a knock on Robinson specifically, just saying I've heard this literally every day for the past two weeks about several guys a day who aren't really pegged as top 50 picks.  Some of them will be, but it's a lot of talk this time of year.

True, but I trust Nagy more than others

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

*unofficial results

  Height Weight Wingspan Vertical Bench Reps Broad Jump 40-yard Dash  
Otis Anderson 5'7.4" 179   36" 11 9'5" 4.63  
Nevelle Clarke* 6'0.7" 171 76 1/2"       4.64  
Tay Gowan 6'0.7" 186 75 1/4" 35.5" 13 9'10" 4.47  
Richie Grant 5'11.5" 197 77" 34.5" 12 10'9" 4.53  
Jacob Harris 6'5" 219 81 1/4" 40.5" 15 11'1" 4.39  
Greg McCrae 5'9.7" 182 73 7/8" 37.5"   10'4" 4.51  
Tre Nixon 6'0.1" 187 73 7/8" 35.5" 18 10'5" 4.43  
Aaron Robinson 5'11.4" 186 72 1/2" 37" 15 10.3" 4.38  
Marlon Williams 5'11.2" 209 73 1/2" 33.5" 14 9'11" 4.62  
Dylan Barnas* 5'7.4" 190 68 7/8"      
Edited by Jeezla
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tylan Wallace
Height: 5113
Weight: 194
40: 4.48
Vertical: 33.0/9'4" BJ
3 Cone: 6.97

Chuba Hubbard
Height: 6000
Weight: 210
40: 4.48
Vertical: 36.0 / 10' BJ
3 Cone: 7.24
20 reps

Dillon Stoner
Height: 6001
Weight: 194
40: 4.51
Vertical: 37.0

Teven Jenkins
Height: 6057
Weight: 317
9 1/2"/ 33 1/2"/ 81"
40: 5.01
Vertical: 32.5
Bench Press: 36
8-10 BJ/ 4.66 shuttle/ 7.72 3C

Edited by Jeezla
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jeezla said:

Tylan Wallace
Height: 5113
Weight: 194
40: 4.48
Vertical: 33.0/9'4" BJ
3 Cone: 6.97

Chuba Hubbard
Height: 6000
Weight: 210
40: 4.48
Vertical: 36.0 / 10' BJ
3 Cone: 7.24
20 reps

Dillon Stoner
Height: 6001
Weight: 194
40: 4.51
Vertical: 37.0

Teven Jenkins
Height: 6057
Weight: 317
9 1/2"/ 33 1/2"/ 81"
40: 5.01
Vertical: 32.5
Bench Press: 36
8-10 BJ/ 4.66 shuttle/ 7.72 3C

I need to watch Teven Jenkins some more, those numbers are very solid and that bench pressure is outstanding and I guess this dude plays very aggressive tough football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ozzy said:

I need to watch Teven Jenkins some more, those numbers are very solid and that bench pressure is outstanding and I guess this dude plays very aggressive tough football.

His hand placement and power packed behind those hands is pretty cool to watch. You can see DL feel it when he strikes them. 
 

A podcast I listen to turned me onto him and I’ve been a fan since. Could slip right into the Raiders hole at RT and provide a boost for that smash mouth running style Gruden wants.

Edited by Fureys49ers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, goldfishwars said:

Wiggins and Forrest are good players, good athletes too.

Yeah watching them I was on the fence if they were big time NFL prospects or not.  But with those times that shows both can be safeties in the league athletically, great athletic times and umps for any safety and both are tough and can tackle.  Forrest I think might be the better of the two but it is close.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Fureys49ers said:

His hand placement and power packed behind those hands is pretty cool to watch. You can see DL feel it when he strikes them. 
 

A podcast I listen to turned me onto him and I’ve been a fan since. Could slip right into the Raiders hole at RT and provide a boost for that smash mouth running style Gruden wants.

Yeah he just takes guys backward and just pushes them completely out of the play.  Honestly never really stood out when I watched them...but did he sit out this past season?  Guess that explains the never noticing him part and could explain why Chuba had a harder time running the ball.  For sure going to have go back on him though and watch some more.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jeezla said:

look at the 3-cone! (Jacob Harris) All of them crushed the 3-cone
That like a 10.05 RAS score if he benches more.

 

Tre Nixon also had a good day. He's a Day 3 sleeper to watch. Deep threat who has the separation quickness to be a good route runner. He's very skinny, though. Reminded me of Paul Richardson.

https://ucfknights.com/news/2021/4/1/football-ucf-pro-day-updates.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozzy said:

Yeah he just takes guys backward and just pushes them completely out of the play.  Honestly never really stood out when I watched them...but did he sit out this past season?  Guess that explains the never noticing him part and could explain why Chuba had a harder time running the ball.  For sure going to have go back on him though and watch some more.

 

He played this past year, I believe the OK St vs Texas game is great one with him and Ossai. I’m pretty sure that was this year. Speaking of Chuba, while OSUs OL certainly wasn’t the best by any stretch of the imagination most of his decline was of his own making. At least from my point of view. Dude just didn’t look like he wanted to be out there at all. Which sucks cause I loved what I saw from him in 2019 and was hoping he’d build on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ozzy said:

No knock on Kyle Pitts, dude is a top 10 pick but hard to say Pitts ran a 4.4 if this is a 4.39.  Same with Toney.  The speed with both Toney and Bateman is just different than Pitts 4.4.  But yeah who cares Pitts is 6-5 245 honestly.  Still the burst off the line and acceleration in some of these 40 times just seems different than others when the end time is close to the same.

 

If anything Bateman in this did not even have a great start and still did not really matter in the end.

It's not hard to say Pitts ran a 4.44 40 when they literally clocked him at that. A 6'6" guy running a 40 isn't going to look like a 5'11" or 6'0" guy running a 40. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jrry32 said:

It's not hard to say Pitts ran a 4.44 40 when they literally clocked him at that. A 6'6" guy running a 40 isn't going to look like a 5'11" or 6'0" guy running a 40. 

Jrr Bear you keep calling him 6’6 when in fact he measured 6’5.5”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...