RaidersAreOne Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 (edited) Update: Edited November 9, 2021 by RaidersAreOne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted November 2, 2021 Author Share Posted November 2, 2021 Raiders: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: Raiders: anti-Semite to the Raiders, what could go wrong I kid I kid Edited November 2, 2021 by Jeezla 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted November 2, 2021 Author Share Posted November 2, 2021 Just now, Jeezla said: anti-Semite to the Raiders, what could go wrong I kid I kid What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, RaidersAreOne said: What? you don't remember? D Jax? Sensitivity training? Julian Edelman reaching out? D Jax was the last person to Gruden themselves prior to Gruden. Edited November 2, 2021 by Jeezla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted November 2, 2021 Author Share Posted November 2, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoBruin Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 Don’t get this from Jackson’s perspective. Seemed like he had a great role carved out on a SB contender. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 1 minute ago, BroncoBruin said: Don’t get this from Jackson’s perspective. Seemed like he had a great role carved out on a SB contender. It’s about money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said: It’s about money. Don't forget sex and power. LA only offered 1 of those. Edited November 2, 2021 by Jeezla 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 Just now, Jeezla said: Don't forget sex and power. Who forgets sex and power? Those are implied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 "subject to waivers" means Lions/Texans/EAGLES get a swing at claiming him first http://www.tankathon.com/nfl/full_draft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rrrrrrrams Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 yeah no. it's miami. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 It's curious no deal could be made from a contender who will likely not have a shot at him in waivers. I suspect there was not much interest at all, otherwise something would have materialized. Rams would be unlikely to trade him to an NFC contender for peanuts, however. So there is that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
43M Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 30 minutes ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said: It’s about money. Does he really think he is going to make much more? He is still solid, but he is never going to be a bonafide starter again. He is a largely one dimensional role player at this point. Might as well do it with a serious contender. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoleINGout Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 so if he is an antisemite then I think the Patriots are out... but it's not like Kraft has operated with any shame before so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.