Jump to content

Week 13 GDT: WFT (5-6) at Raiders (6-5)


NYRaider

Winner  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Who ya got?

    • Raiders
      15
    • WFT
      7


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, BackinBlack said:

I really doubt most QBs are over 50% of 3rd and 4+, thats all I am saying. 

100% agreed he needs to improve on 3rd down though. 

What’s more realistic Jacobs running for 40 tds or us being 50% on 3rd down vs wft. I think the bengals were 50% on third down vs us 2 weeks ago iirc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NCOUGHMAN said:

What’s more realistic Jacobs running for 40 tds or us being 50% on 3rd down vs wft. I think the bengals were 50% on third down vs us 2 weeks ago iirc. 

All im saying if you are expecting us to be 50% on 3rd downs your going to be disappointed more often than not. 
Mahommes against Dal, was 5 of 13 on 3rd down . An Average of 7.7 yards to go. (384%) 
Carr against Dal was, 7 of 18 on 3rd down. An average of 9.2 yards to Go (.388)

On 3rd downs over 5+ KC was 1/6 with an INT
on 3rd downs over 5+ Raiders were 8/14 

3rd and 2 - penalty good
3rd and 7 - no good
3rd and 4 - good
3rd and 4 - no good
3rd and 22 - no good
3rd and 2 - good
3rd and 6- interception
3rd and 14 - no good
3rd and 7 - no good
3rd and 6 - no good
3rd and 1 - good
3rd and 6 - good
3rd and 19 - no good.

Just stating 3rd down percentages means nothing. because you arent giving any context lol. Notice how Mahommes only converts once when its over 5+ yards. Our average 3rd down was 9.2 yards lol. This is both against Dal. 1 week apart. 
Id say, Mahommes is better than Carr, KC Oline Better than ours, their WR better than ours, Their TE split?, def proven more than ours, RBs draw?, Coaching better than ours.

Yet they still struggle on 3rd and long. 
Expecting 50% is crazy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BackinBlack said:

All im saying if you are expecting us to be 50% on 3rd downs your going to be disappointed more often than not. 
Mahommes against Dal, was 5 of 13 on 3rd down . An Average of 7.7 yards to go. (384%) 
Carr against Dal was, 7 of 18 on 3rd down. An average of 9.2 yards to Go (.388)

On 3rd downs over 5+ KC was 1/6 with an INT
on 3rd downs over 5+ Raiders were 8/14 

3rd and 2 - penalty good
3rd and 7 - no good
3rd and 4 - good
3rd and 4 - no good
3rd and 22 - no good
3rd and 2 - good
3rd and 6- interception
3rd and 14 - no good
3rd and 7 - no good
3rd and 6 - no good
3rd and 1 - good
3rd and 6 - good
3rd and 19 - no good.

Just stating 3rd down percentages means nothing. because you arent giving any context lol. Notice how Mahommes only converts once when its over 5+ yards. Our average 3rd down was 9.2 yards lol. This is both against Dal. 1 week apart. 
Id say, Mahommes is better than Carr, KC Oline Better than ours, their WR better than ours, Their TE split?, def proven more than ours, RBs draw?, Coaching better than ours.

Yet they still struggle on 3rd and long. 
Expecting 50% is crazy.

 

That’s why kc has the record that the have this year. Definitely a off year for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, BackinBlack said:

having a better percentage on 3rd down this year vs last year, is why they are doing worse? 51.52% this year, vs 48% last year?
I am confused. 

 

42 minutes ago, BackinBlack said:

having a better percentage on 3rd down this year vs last year, is why they are doing worse? 51.52% this year, vs 48% last year?
I am confused. 

Last game they were 33% iirc

last 3 games 44%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, agarcia34 said:

Their secondary is awful. Raiders with Jackson should be able to take advantage of that all game. The rest advantage the Raiders have is huge especially at this time of the year. But the Raiders have shown they can’t be trusted. A game they should win but we seen them lose this type of game over and over 

If Carr plays well the Raiders win if he doesn’t they don’t win it’s just that simple 

699euo5muhp71.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&a

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NCOUGHMAN said:

 

Last game they were 33% iirc

last 3 games 44%

They are 3-0 in their last 3
if you are saying they are at 44% on 3rd down, that means they are below their season average on 3rd down success, but have had their best stretch in terms of wins in that time period. 
 

probably because pointing to one stat, doesn’t tell an entire story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last 3 games Wash D has really improved on 3rd downs though, and our D has regressed. 
Obviously we need to get them into 3rd and longs and get them off field. If they don’t have McKissic that is a huge loss for them on 3rd downs. 
offensively, we need to stay on down and distance schedule. Limit the stupid Presnap penalties is a big if, but, has a massive impact on our team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...