vegas492 Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 57 minutes ago, thrILL! said: Any WRs you have your eye on? Any WRs that Rodgers will actually throw to? Nope. I'm abstaining from looking at any draft prospects this year. I'll just rely on the board to tell me who the "good" WR's are. Fully expecting someone to say the name "Cody Latimer". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 In looking at the cap and where we are at.... I can't help but feel that negotiation on a JA extension will drag into the summer and possibly camp. We need to be just under the cap, then when that extension hits, it will create room to operate "as usual" and possibly roll over some dollars or get someone else done mid-year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 1 hour ago, MrBobGray said: just that the team is unlikely to offer him what his max value is this year and there's no reason for him to take a pay cut just because he missed time. Agreed. Not sure GB will suggest a pay cut, but they may offer to trade immediate security for a small discount/better structure Jaire's price goes up with each passing day, but then he assumes all of the injury risk. IF he pens a deal now, the gtd cash sets him up for life and there's a fair chance he can re-do the deal in 2-3 years and bump his pay. Waiting = mo money + increased risk. Signing now= enough money + no risk Its a really interesting negotiation for both sides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 4 hours ago, vegas492 said: Simple answer is Yes. So long as the drafted rookie has deep speed or another high end skillset. Let us not forget that MVS was a late round pick and extremely raw. Still kind of is. If we take a rookie WR in round one, I have no doubt the overall skillset will be superior to MVS's when he came in as a rookie. Rodgers threw to MVS as a rookie, because he had to. And it worked to some extent. No reason to think we are in a different position right now the way our WR room looks. I'm gonna pitch a fit if we do not address WR with one of our top 2 picks this year. It is a glaring weakness on our roster. A ******* men. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 Most important move we have left to do (outside of the Adams/Jaire extensions) 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 38 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: Most important move we have left to do (outside of the Adams/Jaire extensions) So he deleted all his Packers posts on IG..........just so he has room for new ones with GB? I'll go with that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 1 minute ago, packfanfb said: So he deleted all his Packers posts on IG..........just so he has room for new ones with GB? I'll go with that. Whenever someone deletes all their posts on IG, they always end up there again. It's like the Rodgers belt mock. Counter-intuitive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rthom348 Posted March 16, 2022 Share Posted March 16, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, R T said: You really want that 10 cent headed prick on the Packers team? It isn't fantasy football they are playing, other people actually have to work with him on a daily basis. No. I want a player who I think would thrive in the system we have. Juju would fit IMO. Also don’t understand why you dislike him so much (basing that off how you described him/idk you). Idk what your fantasy football point is either since no one desired Juju in fantasy football. Idk what juju’s market is right now either. If he’s too expensive then of course I don’t want him. But I’m really starting to think he’s not going to command much in the market. I am fine with being wrong, if I am. Edited March 16, 2022 by rthom348 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green19 Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 9 hours ago, vegas492 said: Simple answer is Yes. So long as the drafted rookie has deep speed or another high end skillset. Let us not forget that MVS was a late round pick and extremely raw. Still kind of is. If we take a rookie WR in round one, I have no doubt the overall skillset will be superior to MVS's when he came in as a rookie. Rodgers threw to MVS as a rookie, because he had to. And it worked to some extent. No reason to think we are in a different position right now the way our WR room looks. I'm gonna pitch a fit if we do not address WR with one of our top 2 picks this year. It is a glaring weakness on our roster. Will Rodgers have to next season? Remember Cobb undercut Amari’s rookie year. Adams, Lazard and Cobb are all higher on the pecking order than a rookie. I would pray that Amari would be too… I mean if we have any hopes for his development and so he doesn’t become yet another 3rd round bust. Tonyan (if healthy) and Jones… would also likely have Rodgers eyes and trust more than a true rookie. I guess my point is I don’t see the QB helping this process. I’m sure a rookie could put up some numbers over the course of 17 games… I just don’t see a rookie changing this offense. Maybe Burks if he is Deebo Samuel-equse. Maybe Olave if he comes in like a Jefferson or Ceedee. I just think it’s a tough spot because Rodgers isn’t a “I throw to the open guy” QB anymore. He is hold until Adams is ready. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 1 minute ago, packfanfb said: We're about 3m under with that, so still need probably one more move to make Campbell official. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 17, 2022 Author Share Posted March 17, 2022 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: We're about 3m under with that, so still need probably one more move to make Campbell official. Yup. Campbell is agreed, but not submitted to league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, packfanfb said: That is a fair deal for what Cobb will bring to the table. He's a guy who should wind up coaching WR for us when he retires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuFF Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Have to wonder if Rodgers is going to cut/traded with Cobb coming back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.