Would you consider these as HOF Trajectory #'s for an NFL RB (throughout his first 6 years)?

[DefenseWinsChampionships]

11 minutes ago, ET80 said:

 

 

The irony.

Care to quote all the posters telling me he's washed up and has no chance of having any more productive years or would those quotes not fit your agenda against me?

I'm not the one claiming he's washed up nor finished when he just recorded damn near 1,300 All-Purpose Yards from Scrimmage and still only 26 years old. 

So if anyone wants to call me out on a silly sig bet? Well then prove that you think he's 'done" and "finished" and on a "steep decline" because if you're telling me all of the above? Well, then; why not be confident that he'll have an even worse 2022 season than 2021's yesr? 

Oh.

The irony. 

When I'm not the one saying he's breaking down (you guys are).

Edited March 4, 2022 by DefenseWinsChampionships

[DefenseWinsChampionships]

4 minutes ago, Forge said:

All evidence to the contrary. 

But hey, you do you. Talking is fun. I like to do it too. 

 

So you have no specific examples. Cool. Nice to know man. 

[Forge]

1 minute ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

So you have no specific examples. Cool. Nice to know man. 

*points to every thread you have ever created and just about every thread you have ever participated in*

What you care about is being right. You don't care about having an honest conversation. 

But keep doing you. Your types typically don't last long around here. 

[ET80]

4 minutes ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

When I'm not the one saying he's breaking down (you guys are)

But you DID say he’d get 1500 yards from scrimmage. And too scared to put your sig on the line.

4 hours ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

He'll go over 1,500 All-Purpose Yards from Scrimmage next year too (had 1,289 last year). 

You'll see. Not really, because I don’t believe this myself… but it helps this princess sleep at night.

 

[DefenseWinsChampionships]

15 minutes ago, ET80 said:

But you DID say he’d get 1500 yards from scrimmage. And too scared to put your sig on the line.

 

I said he'd get 1500 yards after multiple people told me he's done, he's finished, he's steep declining, he's washed up etc etc so if you can make such bold claims and what feels like 100 posts about it? Prove it. 

Show me that you're 100% confident he won't have a better 2022 than 2021...

[ET80]

1 minute ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

I said he'd get 1500 yards after multiple people told me he's done, he's finished, he's steep declining, he's washed up etc etc so if you can make such bold claims and what feels like 100 posts about it? Prove it. 

I’m trying to sig bet you, but…

5 hours ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

He'll go over 1,500 All-Purpose Yards from Scrimmage next year too (had 1,289 last year). 

You'll see. 

 

2 hours ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

Nope I'll only sig bet you that he gets more than 1,289 All-Purpose Yards from Scrimmage …because even I know I’m talking out of my booty, so I need to change the argument instead of backing my own claim

1,500 - offer is on the table. Take it or leave it, snickerdoodle.

[DefenseWinsChampionships]

1 minute ago, ET80 said:

I’m trying to sig bet you, but…

 

1,500 - offer is on the table. Take it or leave it, snickerdoodle.

This is my thread that I created. I'm the one who gets home field advantage here 😜

Worse 2022 year than 2021s season. 

Final offer on the table, and you can either take it or leave it...

[ET80]

2 minutes ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

This is my thread that I created.

This is my website that I manage. I outrank you, snickerdoodle. 🥰

5 hours ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

He'll go over 1,500 All-Purpose Yards from Scrimmage next year too (had 1,289 last year). 

You'll see… nothing from me, because I don’t even believe what I’m saying.

 

[DefenseWinsChampionships]

10 minutes ago, ET80 said:

This is my website that I manage. I outrank you, snickerdoodle. 🥰

 

Ok ok I can agree on that one. You've got me there.

And for what it's worth ET80 I already like you you've got a lot of Football knowledge that I respect and you run a fun site. I've been a Jets poster on strictly Jets forums for many of years but never stumbled upon a Football Forum with not only a Jets message board but also team message boards for every team + a general forum for all fan bases = super fun + me not knowing how to yet interact with other fan bases I can do better. 

Let's lock these Zeke and Amari Cooper threads or else I'll probably find/get myself banned before 2022s draft. 

Edited March 4, 2022 by DefenseWinsChampionships

[ET80]

1 minute ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

Ok ok I can agree on that one. You've got me there.

And for what it's worth ET80 I already like you you've got a lot of Football knowledge that I respect and you run a fun site.

…flattery will get you EVERYWHERE with me. 😁

[Mox]

57 minutes ago, ET80 said:

But you DID say he’d get 1500 yards from scrimmage. And too scared to put your sig on the line.

 

I got the answer I was looking for. I'm satisfied.

[DefenseWinsChampionships]

9 hours ago, Bullet Club said:

I got the answer I was looking for. I'm satisfied.

And so did I. 

That makes the two of us. 

[NJC33]

18 hours ago, DefenseWinsChampionships said:

So you have no specific examples. Cool. Nice to know man. 

@DefenseWinsChampionships Some advice from a fellow Jets fan...

I recognize you from JetNation, I also know you were banned from that site for spewing the same overbearing rhetoric. Your passion for the game bleeds through, which I think everyone can appreciate and has afforded you a great deal of courtesy to this point.  You are not, by any stretch, near the most knowledgeable poster here. That's cool, neither am I. 

Revisit my suggestion in our sub-forum -- use statistics to paint a picture, not tell a story. Your continuous inability to contextualize statistics is a massive detriment to your comprehension of the game; it's dogmatic and significantly undermines your scope of knowledge. Take it for what it's worth. My livelihood is quite literally dependent on my ability to extrapolate data. Like it or not, so much of what you post is meaningless fluff that could be quantifiably exposed -- i.e purporting Shultz catch rate as a definite means of vindication, without considering his depth of target as a variable.   

This board is a lot different than JetNation, nor better or worse, just different. The type of fan-speak that got you kicked from that site isn't allowed here -- it precludes from some of the "fun", but invokes a much higher quality of content. A lot of really informed posters here. Guys who study college tape at the highest level, who have a profound understanding of schematics and philosophies, who apply and share professionally developed statistical analysis. Try to appreciate that? People here engage in thoughtful disagreement with, for the most part, a desire to learn about whatever it is being discussed. We all fall victim to our own bias -- I once, on here, wrongfully crowed Jamal Adams along the like of Troy and Ed Reed, regurgitating statistics in the process.....But, you gotta have some degree of open-mindedness or willingness to learn, brother. 

Just my two-cents. Glad you found another outlet to talk shop, just be wary of exhausting the patience of those rooting for you.

[seminoles1]

Nope.

[Matts4313]

3 hours ago, NJC33 said:

@DefenseWinsChampionships Some advice from a fellow Jets fan...

I recognize you from JetNation, I also know you were banned from that site for spewing the same overbearing rhetoric. Your passion for the game bleeds through, which I think everyone can appreciate and has afforded you a great deal of courtesy to this point.  You are not, by any stretch, near the most knowledgeable poster here. That's cool, neither am I. 

Revisit my suggestion in our sub-forum -- use statistics to paint a picture, not tell a story. Your continuous inability to contextualize statistics is a massive detriment to your comprehension of the game; it's dogmatic and significantly undermines your scope of knowledge. Take it for what it's worth. My livelihood is quite literally dependent on my ability to extrapolate data. Like it or not, so much of what you post is meaningless fluff that could be quantifiably exposed -- i.e purporting Shultz catch rate as a definite means of vindication, without considering his depth of target as a variable.   

This board is a lot different than JetNation, nor better or worse, just different. The type of fan-speak that got you kicked from that site isn't allowed here -- it precludes from some of the "fun", but invokes a much higher quality of content. A lot of really informed posters here. Guys who study college tape at the highest level, who have a profound understanding of schematics and philosophies, who apply and share professionally developed statistical analysis. Try to appreciate that? People here engage in thoughtful disagreement with, for the most part, a desire to learn about whatever it is being discussed. We all fall victim to our own bias -- I once, on here, wrongfully crowed Jamal Adams along the like of Troy and Ed Reed, regurgitating statistics in the process.....But, you gotta have some degree of open-mindedness or willingness to learn, brother. 

Just my two-cents. Glad you found another outlet to talk shop, just be wary of exhausting the patience of those rooting for you.

This is fantastic.