Jump to content

Week 15 Gameday Thread (Buck/Aikman Edition) - Green Bay Packers (5-8-0) vs. LA/St. Louis/LA Rams (4-9-0)


Striker

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said:

I crapped all over him for lack of production. Any prospect with that little of production deserves to be questioned. Let’s not skip over the absence in September, October. He’s still not had more than 4 receptions in a game. And we’re 5-8. So it would definitely have been nice to gotten a more pro ready WR that didn’t take 6 losses to start producing.

dude had a pretty large % of his college teams passing game on an extremely run heavy offense

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said:

I crapped all over him for lack of production. Any prospect with that little of production deserves to be questioned. Let’s not skip over the absence in September, October. He’s still not had more than 4 receptions in a game. And we’re 5-8. So it would definitely have been nice to gotten a more pro ready WR that didn’t take 6 losses to start producing.

Dude got injured, it happens. He was pro-ready and if you think the games he missed because of injury allowed him to get 'pro-ready,' you ain't that bright. 

He can't do anything unless his QB is throwing him the ball when the coach calls his number via play call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said:

I crapped all over him for lack of production. Any prospect with that little of production deserves to be questioned. Let’s not skip over the absence in September, October. He’s still not had more than 4 receptions in a game. And we’re 5-8. So it would definitely have been nice to gotten a more pro ready WR that didn’t take 6 losses to start producing.

He was playing fcs and missed TC you ******* dunce. You have some good takes but you miss some ******* obvious reasons for why things happen and always play it like you were right. Get ****ed. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Norm said:

He was playing fcs and missed TC you ******* dunce. You have some good takes but you miss some ******* obvious reasons for why things happen and always play it like you were right. Get ****ed. 

oooo testy! I didn't read any of the GDT before the last page or two but it sounds feisty in here!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, incognito_man said:

seriously....why the HELL wasn't Nixon returning kicks immediately?

Again, never used that way in College, looked too fearsome as a Gunner during the "MUST REDEEM AMARI" phase, needed him in that role once Ford got promoted to the starting lineup(he might still be in that role, even).

Mind the eyes glued to your butt; you're not supposed to walk backwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...