Sterling84 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Given the most common reported trade comp, that 2nd this year is going to play a vital role for GB. With there not being a ton of top tier talent this year, are people hoping GB stays w the 2 2nds and drafts there? Or do you hope Gutekunst uses 1 to package w 15 and move up in front of Hou to get Smith-Njigba if he's there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 4 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said: Gute or MLF I don’t remember which, said they’d like to add a veteran there. Agree we’re pigeon holed into taking a TE & WR early. Good draft to be in that position. Opposite is true of the safety class we’re facing. So it would be really nice to have an extra top 50 pick to give us some more freedom to make some BPA picks? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 20 hours ago, Norm said: Nah he's a d bag Spoiler alert. You can be a ****** bag and be correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 8 minutes ago, Sterling84 said: Given the most common reported trade comp, that 2nd this year is going to play a vital role for GB. With there not being a ton of top tier talent this year, are people hoping GB stays w the 2 2nds and drafts there? Or do you hope Gutekunst uses 1 to package w 15 and move up in front of Hou to get Smith-Njigba if he's there? How absolutely bat **** insane would it be after not taking a WR first round in ever. To not only doing that as soon as Rodgers leaves, but to trade up as well. I'd laugh so hard. Pettiest thing Gute could ever do. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 2 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Spoiler alert. You can be a ****** bag and be correct. He needs some work at the latter part. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 16 hours ago, Sandy said: He missed a few key points actually on his analysis. Has us operating with about $3m less in functional space because of his intentional pessimism. Again, being pessimistic doesn't mean your take is bad. I mean, we're not all here discrediting @packfanfb for being pessimistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Just now, incognito_man said: He needs some work at the latter part. So he's off by $3M according to Sandy. Who is to say Sandy isn't wrong? Not saying they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Just now, CWood21 said: Again, being pessimistic doesn't mean your take is bad. I mean, we're not all here discrediting @packfanfb for being pessimistic. It does, and we do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Just now, CWood21 said: So he's off by $3M according to Sandy. Who is to say Sandy isn't wrong? Not saying they are. He's off by like $40million in his 2024 cap space post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: He's off by like $40million in his 2024 cap space post. Might as well bring out a Magic 8 ball at that point. Way too many variables to be critical of his projection of the 2024 cap situation. He's using a bit more projection that I'd personally care to see if you're trying to "report" the state of the Packers' cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 11 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Again, being pessimistic doesn't mean your take is bad. I mean, we're not all here discrediting @packfanfb for being pessimistic. I've made strides in my battle with pessimism. One day at a time . 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Just now, packfanfb said: I've made strides in my battle with pessimism. One day at a time . You bring balance to the forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 11 minutes ago, incognito_man said: He's off by like $40million in his 2024 cap space post. He's off by 10, we've discussed this. You're ignoring listed cap vs functional cap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: You bring balance to the forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 7 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Might as well bring out a Magic 8 ball at that point. Way too many variables to be critical of his projection of the 2024 cap situation. He's using a bit more projection that I'd personally care to see if you're trying to "report" the state of the Packers' cap. To be intellectually honest he needs to state his extreme worst case scenario assumptions along with the single, reactionary number. He knows what he's doing and it's intellectually dishonest. 99.9% of people who see that tweet believe that the players on the team RIGHT NOW are $6million over the 2024 cap. When in reality, they're about $35million under it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.