Your Team is Granted 1 Wish....

[August4th]

wish option 1 was conference rival... that would be a easy choice for me

[Zappaz]

As a Chargers fan... even if I picked a kicker that never misses, they would still miss 3 in a playoff game...

 

[FalconFan13]

If the kicker option is regulated to say 45 to 50 yards and less then i would probably go with ym team guaranteed starting out with 5 wins.  I have more than enough confidence in the Falcons to go .500 or better the rest of the season to guarantee a playoff spot. 

[ninjapirate]

I voted for the punting because I thought the kicking one was only with realistic kicks. 

[Hunter2_1]

10 hours ago, TXsteeler said:

Automatic kicker is obvious and I don't see how anybody can argue against it outside of not wanting to pick the OP option. If the Browns kicker always made a FG you could take all 56 of their punts this year and change them to 3 points each and they would end up with the second highest scoring offense in the league with 334 points.

The 2013 Broncos would have averaged over 50 points per game if every single one of their punts was converted into a field goal instead.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/64441086/nfl-statistical-analysis-average-nfl-game according to this the average team gets 12 possessions  and about 1 to 2 turnovers per game so this means you are basically averaging 30+ points per game just from your kicker alone.

Going into a game knowing full well that your kicker will never miss (and with the wording of the bonus you can carry a backup kicker just in case of injury), I see it very hard to not go undefeated even with the most incompetent coaching staff/least talented roster of all time.

I meant that any kicks they normally take wouldn't miss. So they still have to be within their normal kicking range, but they just wouldn't miss. So, instead of 85% average, it would be 100% but from the same kicks. Sorry, I should have made it clearer.

[Hunter2_1]

2 hours ago, ninjapirate said:

I voted for the punting because I thought the kicking one was only with realistic kicks. 

You were correct 

[Hunter2_1]

7 hours ago, August4th said:

wish option 1 was conference rival... that would be a easy choice for me

Likewise

[TXsteeler]

Changing the poll options so much and so late ruins the poll. Most people who voted for "kicker never misses" probably thought like I did where it's an extra 150-200 points a season but if we are only talking normal range kicks then the punt option or the no injury option for QB become your best bet.

[Hunter2_1]

31 minutes ago, TXsteeler said:

Changing the poll options so much and so late ruins the poll. Most people who voted for "kicker never misses" probably thought like I did where it's an extra 150-200 points a season but if we are only talking normal range kicks then the punt option or the no injury option for QB become your best bet.

It was always that, I never changed it. Some people just interpreted it differently. 

[tom cody]

For the Colts it's definitely that last option because of Andrew Luck.

[TXsteeler]

31 minutes ago, Hunter2_1 said:

It was always that, I never changed it. Some people just interpreted it differently. 

It most certainly did not say "from anywhere inside 60 yards" yesterday when I looked at the poll.

[Hunter2_1]

1 minute ago, TXsteeler said:

It most certainly did not say "from anywhere inside 60 yards" yesterday when I looked at the poll.

No, but it means the same thing. I never said "from anywhere", so to avoid further confusion I added the yardage. It was always from normal kicking range, but I obviously didn't make it clear enough.

[TXsteeler]

34 minutes ago, Hunter2_1 said:

No, but it means the same thing. I never said "from anywhere", so to avoid further confusion I added the yardage. It was always from normal kicking range, but I obviously didn't make it clear enough.

My point is that I think most people interpreted it the same way I did, so if you want this poll to have any actual value at what people really think, you would have to repost it, because I don't see a way to change your vote.

[Pugger]

I think I'll stick with my orginal thought even tho it isn't an option now.  If we had everyone back and healthy - and I'm not just talking about #12 - we wouldn't be in 3rd place in our division.

[Hunter2_1]

26 minutes ago, TXsteeler said:

My point is that I think most people interpreted it the same way I did, so if you want this poll to have any actual value at what people really think, you would have to repost it, because I don't see a way to change your vote.

Are you seriously getting this hooked up on a little fun poll? You're done.

Au revoir Shoshanna.