wgbeethree Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: Shhh, you're not supposed to count the long runs. If you take away his successful plays, then he's only 3 YPC. Oh wait, that's every RB ever in the history of the NFL. @wgbeethree I'm just messing, but let's give him 8 games before making a NFL call for the negative. I appreciate the good natured ribbing. I'm saying give him 8 weeks before giving him a judgement too. I'm just very strongly suggesting the week one stats won't be reflective of his talent/ability/ lack there of. YouTube "dalvin cook week 1 highlights". You won't come away impressed. Literally nothing other than two "gimme runs". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: You say that he's better than Duce Staley (Latavius Murray) but worse than Brian Westbrook (Jerick McKinnon). At least, that's how I'd do a Buckhalter comp. You think he's worse than Jerrick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 (edited) 17 minutes ago, NormSizedMidget said: You think he's worse than Jerrick? Well, It's an insult to Westbrook to make a Mckinnon to Westbrook comp. Westbrook was amazing. Incog was asking how to make a Buckhalter comp, I'm just tryna show how. Edited September 17, 2017 by skibrett15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, skibrett15 said: Well, It's an insult to Westbrook to make a Mckinnon to Westbrook comp. Westbrook was amazing. Incog was asking how to make a Buckhalter comp, I'm just tryna show how. Touche. I was kind of lost by the whole thing.. Also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Vince Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 Broncos have taken away Elliott's spoon, not feasting today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 (edited) This is why I'm cautiously optimistic but not overly-hyping our defense until I see how they play tonight. Seattle has 6 points at home v. SF at half. They are a very weak offensive team. Conversely tonight we will face one of the strongest offensive teams we will see all year. Edited September 17, 2017 by packfanfb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOnlyThing Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 Sorry if it has been mentioned, but seeing Eddie Lacy a healthy scratch in week 2 pretty much confirms in my mind that letting him sign elsewhere was a wise decision. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, packfanfb said: This is why I'm cautiously optimistic but not overly-hyping our defense until I see how they play tonight. Seattle has 6 points at home v. SF at half. They are a very weak offensive team. Conversely tonight we will face one of the strongest offensive teams we will see all year. and TB crushed CHI, so I'm not as concerned about ATL's offense who only managed 23 against Chicago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cakeshoppe Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 Currently predicting that the seahawks don't make the playoffs this year. They still have a nasty defense but that offense is downright bad. 0 tds in their first 6 quarters of the year and averaging less than 3 points per quarter. Also, quite the fall from grace for lacy from his 2013/2014 form. I like the guy but it just seems football isn't his thing anymore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 15 minutes ago, incognito_man said: and TB crushed CHI, so I'm not as concerned about ATL's offense who only managed 23 against Chicago. Not sure that means much since it was AT Chicago. ATL might have put up 40 on them at home. Who knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Not sure that means much since it was AT Chicago. ATL might have put up 40 on them at home. Who knows. None of it matters IMO because the transitive property of the NFL doesn't apply week to week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Vince Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 1 hour ago, incognito_man said: and TB crushed CHI, so I'm not as concerned about ATL's offense who only managed 23 against Chicago. And the Cowboys are getting it handed to them by Denver. 3rd Quarter zero yards for Elliot. NFC is wide open. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 (edited) . Edited September 18, 2017 by skibrett15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skibrett15 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 (edited) . Edited September 18, 2017 by skibrett15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackyAttacky Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, incognito_man said: and TB crushed CHI, so I'm not as concerned about ATL's offense who only managed 23 against Chicago. Ummmmmm? SO is our D the worst? Or is Atlanta legit? Edited September 18, 2017 by PackyAttacky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.