oldmansmell Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 If this happens I will say TT needs to get some credit for making this a financial possibility, even if its partly due to poor drafting, with little capital to boot, in recent years. The Sitton/Lang moves, letting Hyde and Hayward walk, were all probably tough pills to swallow, but Mack could make them look like some happy drugs in hindsight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrILL! Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 6 hours ago, Norm said: What if he really gets traded to us at page 100 1 word: Atlanta Georgia Super Bowl baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siman08/OH Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, oldmansmell said: If this happens I will say TT needs to get some credit for making this a financial possibility, even if its partly due to poor drafting, with little capital to boot, in recent years. The Sitton/Lang moves, letting Hyde and Hayward walk, were all probably tough pills to swallow, but Mack could make them look like some happy drugs in hindsight... What would this team look like if he still had Hayward and Hyde? Would we even need Mack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmansmell Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 That Front 7 might be the best in the league if it goes down as well. Mack wilkerson Clark Daniels Perry is probably better than Miller Wolfe Williams Jackson Ware, even if they probably had a better overall D, and they won with Manning throwing ducks beyond 5 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmansmell Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 1 minute ago, Siman08/OH said: What would this team look like if he still had Hayward and Hyde? Would we even need Mack? Hayward makes us better for sure, but definitely don't think we need/would/could've kept both. Hyde is one of those guys that market value is above his actual value I think, even if that sounds pretty stupid when I think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheesehawk Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 Time to make this happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 6 minutes ago, Siman08/OH said: What would this team look like if he still had Hayward and Hyde? Would we even need Mack? I was just going to say... But. We'd still want him. Be honest lol We'd just need to clear more cap down the line! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 12 minutes ago, thrILL! said: 1 word: Atlanta Georgia Super Bowl baby what do he supposed to say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 I'll quit drinking if we trade for Mack..top that **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmansmell Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 Mathews, (2018) 1st (From Saints), 2nd, 6th (from Seahawks) (2019) 1st, 3rd (2020) 2nd? 2 1sts 2 2nds a 3rd and a 6th (with only 1 st and 2nds and 3rd being original capital). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmansmell Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 13 minutes ago, Norm said: I was just going to say... But. We'd still want him. Be honest lol We'd just need to clear more cap down the line! Be honest TT would have just drafted Harrell clones, and at least one of Hayward/Hyde would have had a career threatening injury, because TT cut their brakes and they hit a wall or something. Plus we'd still probably have Dom and we all know he sux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mox Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 12 minutes ago, oldmansmell said: Mathews, (2018) 1st (From Saints), 2nd, 6th (from Seahawks) (2019) 1st, 3rd (2020) 2nd? 2 1sts 2 2nds a 3rd and a 6th (with only 1 st and 2nds and 3rd being original capital). Not happening. No way they give up 2 1sts AND 2 2nds and more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACKRULE Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 13 minutes ago, oldmansmell said: Mathews, (2018) 1st (From Saints), 2nd, 6th (from Seahawks) (2019) 1st, 3rd (2020) 2nd? 2 1sts 2 2nds a 3rd and a 6th (with only 1 st and 2nds and 3rd being original capital). To me that's just not worth it on top of opening the door to having to pay a single D player that much money. I'd prefer to put that off for a bit as our highest defensive players is making half of what Mack wants. Mack may be a great player but dam he's just not worth all the possibilities of what those picks could be plus the new picks. Great D is more than just one player ask Denver last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TransientTexan Posted August 29, 2018 Share Posted August 29, 2018 11 minutes ago, oldmansmell said: Mathews, (2018) 1st (From Saints), 2nd, 6th (from Seahawks) (2019) 1st, 3rd (2020) 2nd? 2 1sts 2 2nds a 3rd and a 6th (with only 1 st and 2nds and 3rd being original capital). I don't think that does it. Future picks are valued less, so the sum total of that is probably equivalent to the value of the Jets' 2019 1st and I'm betting the Jets offered at least that in the deal that was rumored to have been declined by OAK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.