Superman(DH23) Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Foots definitely out.of bounds. I'd pound it in with Howard, but look for Shaheen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slateman Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Slateman said: This Cohen guy is pretty quick Mighty quick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurion Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 I needed 15 points today from Gurley and Parkey. 1 guy's stepping up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmittyBacall Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, The LBC said: I mean, he can play centerfielder, but like you said, you don't get to take advantage of his versatility playing him that far back - similar in that respect to Polamalu. Except in Derwin's case because he has size (and arguably some athleticism) on Polamalu, he's able to gain even greater versatility in use - hence him actually even getting some DL snaps this season (which is really more of him being played as a LEO or Elephant Backer than a hand-in-the-dirt DL) and at boundary corner in some instances. Right. If I remember correctly they tracked James positioning thus far at about 60% at SS, 20% at FS, and 10% at CB, nickel, WLB, SLB and DE. Nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RamRod Posted December 10, 2018 Author Share Posted December 10, 2018 How do we get scored on by offensive lineman in back to back games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Just now, riceman80 said: This Bears D is good enough to carry this team to the Super Bowl if Trubisky just doesnt screw it up Been saying it all year, this defense is not only "good".....they are historically good. And doing it during a year when offenses are putting up historic numbers. YEAR Team Total DVOA RK Rank Prv Yr Rank Wtd DVOA Wtd RK Rank Pass DVOA Rank Rush DVOA Rank Non-Adj VOA Non-Adj Pass VOA Non-Adj Rush VOA Variance Rank 1991 PHI -42.40% 1 1 0 -42.40% 1 1 -48.60% 1 -34.90% 1 -38.20% -42.30% -33.30% 9.50% 25 2002 TB -31.80% 2 1 2 -28.70% 7 1 -51.90% 1 -8.80% 8 -33.90% -54.70% -10.00% 5.30% 16 2008 PIT -29.00% 3 1 3 -30.70% 4 1 -32.80% 1 -24.20% 2 -26.90% -31.90% -20.60% 4.90% 14 2004 BUF -28.50% 4 1 7 -36.30% 2 1 -34.70% 1 -21.90% 2 -28.50% -34.30% -22.40% 9.60% 29 2008 BAL -27.80% 5 2 5 -25.10% 10 3 -27.10% 2 -28.60% 1 -29.10% -28.40% -30.10% 6.10% 23 2012 CHI -26.80% 6 1 4 -22.80% 18 1 -29.00% 1 -23.20% 1 -23.40% -25.00% -20.70% 4.80% 14 2013 SEA -25.90% 7 1 2 -30.00% 5 1 -34.20% 1 -15.20% 7 -27.90% -34.30% -19.70% 8.30% 28 2015 DEN -25.80% 8 1 4 -22.10% 20 1 -28.00% 1 -22.80% 4 -22.70% -21.60% -24.10% 4.40% 14 2009 NYJ -25.50% 9 1 14 -29.20% 6 1 -36.50% 1 -13.90% 7 -24.90% -34.90% -14.30% 14.50% 32 2003 BAL -25.00% 10 1 6 -31.70% 3 1 -29.50% 1 -19.90% 3 -25.30% -29.60% -20.40% 8.60% 25 2000 TEN -25.00% 10 1 20 -28.10% 8 1 -23.00% 2 -27.40% 2 -28.40% -30.80% -25.60% 7.50% 24 1991 NO -24.50% 12 2 0 -17.90% 48 3 -33.10% 2 -12.30% 5 -23.60% -31.90% -11.70% 12.60% 28 2000 BAL -23.80% 13 2 1 -24.00% 14 2 -14.80% 7 -36.60% 1 -28.30% -21.90% -37.40% 3.60% 2 1995 SF -23.70% 14 1 7 -20.50% 26 2 -22.80% 1 -25.20% 2 -22.20% -19.10% -27.10% 4.60% 11 2008 PHI -23.60% 15 3 12 -27.80% 9 2 -23.40% 3 -23.90% 3 -23.20% -26.30% -19.60% 4.20% 10 2006 BAL -23.00% 16 1 6 -21.30% 22 1 -21.40% 3 -25.30% 2 -25.20% -23.40% -25.40% 5.90% 18 1998 MIA -22.40% 17 1 28 -19.60% 29 1 -27.60% 1 -16.10% 6 -19.70% -22.00% -17.00% 10.30% 28 2018 CHI -22.00% 18 1 1 -20.80% 25 1 -16.40% 1 -30.40% 1 -25.50% -18.70% -35.70% 3.00% 4 1990 PIT -21.60% 19 1 15 -18.10% 43 2 -31.20% 1 -13.10% 4 -20.00% -28.50% -12.40% 8.50% 19 1997 SF -21.20% 20 1 2 -14.70% 85 4 -23.20% 1 -18.80% 2 -22.90% -24.40% -21.10% 9.80% 28 1991 WAS -21.10% 21 3 0 -18.40% 39 2 -28.90% 3 -10.20% 8 -21.20% -28.30% -11.50% 9.10% 24 1999 BAL -20.80% 22 1 13 -23.10% 17 1 -21.70% 2 -19.50% 2 -20.20% -22.00% -17.40% 7.20% 22 2010 PIT -20.70% 23 1 9 -17.50% 52 1 -15.70% 3 -29.00% 1 -19.00% -14.10% -27.00% 6.80% 21 2006 CHI -20.10% 24 2 1 -17.50% 52 2 -25.50% 1 -12.90% 6 -25.90% -29.10% -18.20% 5.10% 13 2004 BAL -19.90% 25 2 1 -18.70% 36 3 -22.90% 2 -16.80% 4 -15.00% -17.30% -12.70% 6.60% 17 That said, it's hard to count on a young QB to take you to a SB on his first appearance so I doubt it this year. But next year the same defensive core players will still be here, so I like the chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game3525 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Nagy is a troll lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmittyBacall Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Nagy is out McVaying McVay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 wow, excellent play call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
11sanchez11 Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Sowell is a terrible lineman but good enough at TE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I <3 Faulk Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 2 weeks in a row the defense has given up a TD to a lineman. I'm not even mad. I'm impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Small Town Values Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Love that play calling. Get in there big fella Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 That might be my favorite red zone play all season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurion Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 OK, that was cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted December 10, 2018 Share Posted December 10, 2018 Just now, JustAnotherFan said: Been saying it all year, this defense is not only "good".....they are historically good. And doing it during a year when offenses are putting up historic numbers. YEAR Team Total DVOA RK Rank Prv Yr Rank Wtd DVOA Wtd RK Rank Pass DVOA Rank Rush DVOA Rank Non-Adj VOA Non-Adj Pass VOA Non-Adj Rush VOA Variance Rank 1991 PHI -42.40% 1 1 0 -42.40% 1 1 -48.60% 1 -34.90% 1 -38.20% -42.30% -33.30% 9.50% 25 2002 TB -31.80% 2 1 2 -28.70% 7 1 -51.90% 1 -8.80% 8 -33.90% -54.70% -10.00% 5.30% 16 2008 PIT -29.00% 3 1 3 -30.70% 4 1 -32.80% 1 -24.20% 2 -26.90% -31.90% -20.60% 4.90% 14 2004 BUF -28.50% 4 1 7 -36.30% 2 1 -34.70% 1 -21.90% 2 -28.50% -34.30% -22.40% 9.60% 29 2008 BAL -27.80% 5 2 5 -25.10% 10 3 -27.10% 2 -28.60% 1 -29.10% -28.40% -30.10% 6.10% 23 2012 CHI -26.80% 6 1 4 -22.80% 18 1 -29.00% 1 -23.20% 1 -23.40% -25.00% -20.70% 4.80% 14 2013 SEA -25.90% 7 1 2 -30.00% 5 1 -34.20% 1 -15.20% 7 -27.90% -34.30% -19.70% 8.30% 28 2015 DEN -25.80% 8 1 4 -22.10% 20 1 -28.00% 1 -22.80% 4 -22.70% -21.60% -24.10% 4.40% 14 2009 NYJ -25.50% 9 1 14 -29.20% 6 1 -36.50% 1 -13.90% 7 -24.90% -34.90% -14.30% 14.50% 32 2003 BAL -25.00% 10 1 6 -31.70% 3 1 -29.50% 1 -19.90% 3 -25.30% -29.60% -20.40% 8.60% 25 2000 TEN -25.00% 10 1 20 -28.10% 8 1 -23.00% 2 -27.40% 2 -28.40% -30.80% -25.60% 7.50% 24 1991 NO -24.50% 12 2 0 -17.90% 48 3 -33.10% 2 -12.30% 5 -23.60% -31.90% -11.70% 12.60% 28 2000 BAL -23.80% 13 2 1 -24.00% 14 2 -14.80% 7 -36.60% 1 -28.30% -21.90% -37.40% 3.60% 2 1995 SF -23.70% 14 1 7 -20.50% 26 2 -22.80% 1 -25.20% 2 -22.20% -19.10% -27.10% 4.60% 11 2008 PHI -23.60% 15 3 12 -27.80% 9 2 -23.40% 3 -23.90% 3 -23.20% -26.30% -19.60% 4.20% 10 2006 BAL -23.00% 16 1 6 -21.30% 22 1 -21.40% 3 -25.30% 2 -25.20% -23.40% -25.40% 5.90% 18 1998 MIA -22.40% 17 1 28 -19.60% 29 1 -27.60% 1 -16.10% 6 -19.70% -22.00% -17.00% 10.30% 28 2018 CHI -22.00% 18 1 1 -20.80% 25 1 -16.40% 1 -30.40% 1 -25.50% -18.70% -35.70% 3.00% 4 1990 PIT -21.60% 19 1 15 -18.10% 43 2 -31.20% 1 -13.10% 4 -20.00% -28.50% -12.40% 8.50% 19 1997 SF -21.20% 20 1 2 -14.70% 85 4 -23.20% 1 -18.80% 2 -22.90% -24.40% -21.10% 9.80% 28 1991 WAS -21.10% 21 3 0 -18.40% 39 2 -28.90% 3 -10.20% 8 -21.20% -28.30% -11.50% 9.10% 24 1999 BAL -20.80% 22 1 13 -23.10% 17 1 -21.70% 2 -19.50% 2 -20.20% -22.00% -17.40% 7.20% 22 2010 PIT -20.70% 23 1 9 -17.50% 52 1 -15.70% 3 -29.00% 1 -19.00% -14.10% -27.00% 6.80% 21 2006 CHI -20.10% 24 2 1 -17.50% 52 2 -25.50% 1 -12.90% 6 -25.90% -29.10% -18.20% 5.10% 13 2004 BAL -19.90% 25 2 1 -18.70% 36 3 -22.90% 2 -16.80% 4 -15.00% -17.30% -12.70% 6.60% 17 That said, it's hard to count on a young QB to take you to a SB on his first appearance so I doubt it this year. But next year the same defensive core players will still be here, so I like the chances. um what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.