MD4L Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 I like prop 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 22, 2019 Author Share Posted March 22, 2019 So if we eliminate prop 5 before prop 3, it's 9-7 prop 2 with Jlash and MD4L splitting votes If we eliminate prop 3 before prop 5, it's 9-6 with Rags on prop 2, Counslor, bcb, Ruskie and wwhicock on no change, and Lukic not voting yet. Can we all move on now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringinDaPain Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 So who's on first and who's on second? What inning is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, TedLavie said: So if we eliminate prop 5 before prop 3, it's 9-7 prop 2 with Jlash and MD4L splitting votes If we eliminate prop 3 before prop 5, it's 9-6 with Rags on prop 2, Counslor, bcb, Ruskie and wwhicock on no change, and Lukic not voting yet. Can we all move on now? Ww bailed to no change so it actually wouldn't be nine if its 2 vs 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 22, 2019 Author Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: Ww bailed to no change so it actually wouldn't be nine if its 2 vs 3 wwhicock was always on prop 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 9 minutes ago, TedLavie said: wwhicock was always on prop 3 Therefore current status is: Reduce to 12 games, with no Thanksgiving and no W17 YES (10) - Rags, wwhicock, Ted, Whicker, Hockey, pheltz, SirA, BDP, Xmad, PR NO (4) - Counselor, bcb, MD4L, Jlash I do think this was the best method to get to the most satisfactory result for most owners, though it took a lot of time and effort. It is of course arguable, but I've argued enough. Now, was I factually incorrect in any of the details before? If not, we can move on to a much more relaxing item 13, starting tomorr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 22, 2019 Author Share Posted March 22, 2019 14 minutes ago, bcb1213 said: Therefore current status is: Reduce to 12 games, with no Thanksgiving and no W17 YES (10) - Rags, wwhicock, Ted, Whicker, Hockey, pheltz, SirA, BDP, Xmad, PR NO (4) - Counselor, bcb, MD4L, Jlash I do think this was the best method to get to the most satisfactory result for most owners, though it took a lot of time and effort. It is of course arguable, but I've argued enough. Now, was I factually incorrect in any of the details before? If not, we can move on to a much more relaxing item 13, starting tomorr Hmmm what? Prop 2 vs prop 3 Prop 2 (9) - Ted, pheltz, whicker, hockey, SirA, PR, BDP, Xmad, Jlash Prop 3 (7) - Ww, bcb, Rags, Counselor, Ruskie, MD4L, Lukic Prop 2 vs current (Lukic hasn't voted yet) Prop 2 (9) - Ted, pheltz, whicker, hockey, SirA, PR, BDP, Xmad, Rags Prop 3 (6) - Ww, bcb, Jlash Counselor, Ruskie, MD4L It's done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 53 minutes ago, TedLavie said: I'm saying it for one freakin last time. After that I'm done. An owner's meeting is CHANGE vs NO CHANGE. It's always been like that. I don't blame new guys for not knowing this. But Rags, common, you've been around since the beginning, you know how it is You can't have CHANGE 1 vs CHANGE 2 vs NO CHANGE because votes for change can dilute between CHANGE 1 and CHANGE 2, it's harder to have a majority and, therefore, gives a better chance of a NO CHANGE even if the majority is for a change. (Like here. Prop 2 vs Prop 3 vs No change, you don't have a majority, while at least Rags and 8 others prefer a change than nothing) But if it makes you feel any better @Jlash @MD4L Prop 2 or Prop 3? Also I'll say nothing about the accusations and I'll finish this meeting. But don't expect me to take any future responsibilities after this. That makes sense, thanks for clarifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, TedLavie said: Hmmm what? Prop 2 vs prop 3 Prop 2 (9) - Ted, pheltz, whicker, hockey, SirA, PR, BDP, Xmad, Jlash Prop 3 (7) - Ww, bcb, Rags, Counselor, Ruskie, MD4L, Lukic Prop 2 vs current (Lukic hasn't voted yet) Prop 2 (9) - Ted, pheltz, whicker, hockey, SirA, PR, BDP, Xmad, Rags Prop 3 (6) - Ww, bcb, Jlash Counselor, Ruskie, MD4L It's done Jlash voted for two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 I'll guarantee you you if Jlash has the option of voting 2 vs 3 where if he votes 3 nothing changes, he's taking three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 22, 2019 Author Share Posted March 22, 2019 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: Jlash voted for two? 44 minutes ago, Jlash said: If I absolutely can't keep it at no change like I said, then it would be 2. I'm very opposed to starting in preseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 So...2 was the winner. Whats the next topic lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Why did you you bring this back up to make me think it wasn't gonna happen. Damn you ted lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey5djh Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 4 hours ago, bcb1213 said: No you can't lol. You're gonna have to make a new one every season with first playing first etc Welcome to unbalanced scheduele hell Its really not as bad as you're stating. I won't have the two team names based on record but I could pretty much have everything else done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 22, 2019 Author Share Posted March 22, 2019 Quote Topic: 13. Extend voting deadlines to Wednesday 11:59pm EST Idea submitter: TedLavie Current situation: Voting deadline is on Wednesday at noon Argument for : Currently people are voting on Tuesdays and early on Wed because they're waiting for MNF. I simply offer to give more room for people if they're not here on Tuesdays for IRL reasons Applicable on: Now This one should be less controversial. Only downside I see is the waivers schedule as submissions have to be made by Wed. night. Maybe we can push it a bit since bcb always does it on Thursdays anyway. What do you think @bcb1213 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.