Jump to content

2019 MLB Regular Season Discussion


Thelonebillsfan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Thelonebillsfan said:

His cousin is so bad, cost him the derby

Nope. If he loses he cost himself by picking him. Can't blame a guy for not being good. Blame the guy that selected someone who wasn't good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Thelonebillsfan said:

Vlad and Pete Alonso are both making $550K this year. The winner of the derby will make $1M.

God I hate sports owners.

What kind of contract did Vlad Jr deserve for a guy who never played in the majors until this year. The same with Alonso? How can you hate the owners for the contracts the rookies have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, buno67 said:

What kind of contract did Vlad Jr deserve for a guy who never played in the majors until this year. The same with Alonso?

If Vlad Jr. was a free agent going into this season, he probably gets north of $100MM. Alonso gets less.

24 minutes ago, buno67 said:

How can you hate the owners for the contracts the rookies have?

For years, the unwritten rule between players and owners was that rookies and pre-FA players would be underpaid, and FA would get overpaid to make up for it. That's not a perfect system, but in general it washed out. 

FA are not overpaid. Not even close anymore, and as a result the share the players get of revenue has dropped from 50% (which is the number that virtually all other pro sports live at), to 40%. In this case, that's north of a billion dollars/year that the players should be getting, and they aren't. 

What have the owners done with that? Well, they've invested some of it in lobbying politicians in states with spring training facilities like Arizona to make sure that minor leaguers can't even get minimum wage. They've also put in a hard cap on spending in the international market to try and deflate the prices of 16 year old Latin American kids with no leverage who never had a chance to collectively bargain for their own interests.

Saying "how can you hate owners for rookie contracts" is an incomplete question. You have to look at the big picture of how baseball owners have treated players over the past 5-8 years, and when you do, there's plenty of opportunity to hate them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ramssuperbowl99 said:

If Vlad Jr. was a free agent going into this season, he probably gets north of $100MM. Alonso gets less.

For years, the unwritten rule between players and owners was that rookies and pre-FA players would be underpaid, and FA would get overpaid to make up for it. That's not a perfect system, but in general it washed out. 

FA are not overpaid. Not even close anymore, and as a result the share the players get of revenue has dropped from 50% (which is the number that virtually all other pro sports live at), to 40%. In this case, that's north of a billion dollars/year that the players should be getting, and they aren't. 

What have the owners done with that? Well, they've invested some of it in lobbying politicians in states with spring training facilities like Arizona to make sure that minor leaguers can't even get minimum wage. They've also put in a hard cap on spending in the international market to try and deflate the prices of 16 year old Latin American kids with no leverage who never had a chance to collectively bargain for their own interests.

Saying "how can you hate owners for rookie contracts" is an incomplete question. You have to look at the big picture of how baseball owners have treated players over the past 5-8 years, and when you do, there's plenty of opportunity to hate them.

No way would an untested Vlad Jr get $100m contract before this season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, buno67 said:

No way would an untested Vlad Jr get $100m contract before this season...

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/an-update-to-prospect-valuation/

Prospects who are as good as Vlad Jr. (70 FV+, position player) averaged $112.5MM value over their first 6 seasons. If Vlad was a free agent, he wouldn't be limited to just selling those 6 years, so yeah he would have gotten those kinds of offers had he been a FA.

If you want a real world example, Acuna got $100MM this offseason and it was (correctly) described as a wild, wild underpay that probably cost him $100MM after like 100 games. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ramssuperbowl99 said:

If Vlad Jr. was a free agent going into this season, he probably gets north of $100MM. Alonso gets less.

For years, the unwritten rule between players and owners was that rookies and pre-FA players would be underpaid, and FA would get overpaid to make up for it. That's not a perfect system, but in general it washed out. 

FA are not overpaid. Not even close anymore, and as a result the share the players get of revenue has dropped from 50% (which is the number that virtually all other pro sports live at), to 40%. In this case, that's north of a billion dollars/year that the players should be getting, and they aren't. 

What have the owners done with that? Well, they've invested some of it in lobbying politicians in states with spring training facilities like Arizona to make sure that minor leaguers can't even get minimum wage. They've also put in a hard cap on spending in the international market to try and deflate the prices of 16 year old Latin American kids with no leverage who never had a chance to collectively bargain for their own interests.

Saying "how can you hate owners for rookie contracts" is an incomplete question. You have to look at the big picture of how baseball owners have treated players over the past 5-8 years, and when you do, there's plenty of opportunity to hate them.

Yove said this a few times. Youre either flat out lying/making stuff up or have legit proof of it. Which one, cause its very likely that its the former but id love to be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...