LETSGOBROWNIES Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 19 minutes ago, MWil23 said: How misogynistic of you to think that my doctor is a male You go to a female dong doc huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 6 minutes ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said: You go to a female dong doc huh? LOL Absolutely NOT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, MWil23 said: 16 minutes ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said: You go to a female dong doc huh? LOL Absolutely NOT Edited March 13, 2020 by ramssuperbowl99 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skywindO2 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 40 minutes ago, MWil23 said: How misogynistic of you to think that my doctor is a male I'm suddenly more interested in finding out if your wife is sleeping with your doctor. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 hour ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: That's to make it really, really, really, really easy for anyone who can count to 1,500 and isn't RB colorblind to see how similar the progression is. If you can't see how a two-week difference in starting date undermines the progression comparison, along with stark demographic and difference in population numbers, I don't know what to tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theJ Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Tetsujin said: If you can't see how a two-week difference in starting date undermines the progression comparison, along with stark demographic and difference in population numbers, I don't know what to tell you. I think we all understand what the chart is trying to tell us. Please tell us why the chart is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, skywindO2 said: I'm suddenly more interested in finding out if your wife is sleeping with your doctor. ...moreso than if she was pregnant by that same doctor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skywindO2 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, MWil23 said: ...moreso than if she was pregnant by that same doctor? You think I'd scroll up to see what the original question was about? You expect too much of me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 2 minutes ago, theJ said: I think we all understand what the chart is trying to tell us. Please tell us why the chart is wrong. "Dude, no way we can use data from Italy. That **** happened on Monday, it's Wednesday now." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, theJ said: I think we all understand what the chart is trying to tell us. Please tell us why the chart is wrong. Nobody saying it's "wrong". I'm saying it's useless for multiple reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LETSGOBROWNIES Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 minute ago, Tetsujin said: Nobody saying it's "wrong". I'm saying it's useless for multiple reasons. I don’t think the dense population is all that valid tbh. We have lots of wide open land and a huge country comparatively, it’s gonna be less densely populated statistically. That said, are our big cities and suburbs, you know, where the majority of the population lives, any less dense? Or so less dense it’s actually meaningful? Idk man... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mox Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 The good news is we have the data missing from the chart and we are actually trending lower than Italy now. Italy 3/1 - 1,694 Italy 3/2 - 2,036 U.S. 3/12 - 1,281 U.S. 3/13 - 1,683 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 3 hours ago, ET80 said: My church (which is maybe 100+ on Easter) is not cancelling services, but asking people to make best judgements. My pastor called me and told me to keep distance, simply for the kids' sake. And now, we're cancelling services for the foreseeable future. One of our members is a Hematologist at Baylor College of Medicine - she strongly suggested we cancel. So, my Sunday is free now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 Just now, LETSGOBROWNIES said: I don’t think the dense population is all that valid tbh. variations in Relative Density are on display in this thread - and I find them rather illuminating 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted March 13, 2020 Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 minute ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said: I don’t think the dense population is all that valid tbh. We have lots of wide open land and a huge country comparatively, it’s gonna be less densely populated statistically. That said, are our big cities and suburbs, you know, where the majority of the population lives, any less dense? Or so less dense it’s actually meaningful? Idk man... And, you know, the country with the denser population is on lockdown while we have people still traveling. Population density is a proxy for "encounter rate", basically. How often you would run into other people and be able to expose them. We've seen the R0 value stay really consistent regardless of the size of the population or the density, everything progressed exponentially. Ironically enough, the very chart that the progression in the US and Italy that he's criticizing is actual evidence that all of the factors he's spouting off are not relevant. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts