LETSGOBROWNIES Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, MookieMonstah said: Really sorry to hear this man. Thoughts are with you and them. Appreciate it, but I’ve never met the girl or her mother. Just sharing to illustrate why some people are so arsed up about masks and those who oppose them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, TVScout said: Maybe I'm missing something. Why did you post this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVScout Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 1 hour ago, theJ said: Also, i know the resulting death rate is only 0.02%, but damn. 4 kids died man. Where did you get .02%? That link claims zero for children under age 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVScout Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, MookieMonstah said: Maybe I'm missing something. Why did you post this? Perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Just now, TVScout said: Perspective. As to what? Why its okay to sentence kids to death because of COVID? Im confused Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 1 minute ago, TVScout said: Where did you get .02%? That link claims zero for children under age 10. The wonderful genius of Public Education, Betsy Devos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theJ Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, TVScout said: Where did you get .02%? That link claims zero for children under age 10. Maybe i misread it, but i was looking at all cases through age 18 (school age). The chart you shared shows 4 deaths out of 17,073 cases. 2 deaths ages 10-14, 2 deaths ages 15-17. 4 / 17,073 x100 = 0.02%. Did i slip a digit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, TVScout said: Perspective. Thanks for the super useful data. Now when someone sends their kids to elementary school, we can compare that to the number of 8 years old who die from suicide and drug overdoses. Which I'm sure are the real epidemics in the elementary school community. If you're posting data for "perspective", break it down so it actually provides meaningful perspective. Edited July 16, 2020 by ramssuperbowl99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theJ Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, MookieMonstah said: As to what? Why its okay to sentence kids to death because of COVID? Im confused No i don't think so. Just a perspective as to how many kids die each year. If 0.02% sticks across the board, COVID wouldn't just be a drop in the bucket. It would be a leading cause of deaths for children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVScout Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, MookieMonstah said: The wonderful genius of Public Education, Betsy Devos. Info in the link states there have been 7667 children under the age of ten tested positive. It also indicates none have died. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, theJ said: No i don't think so. Just a perspective as to how many kids die each year. If 0.02% sticks across the board, COVID wouldn't just be a drop in the bucket. It would be a leading cause of deaths for children. We really should break it out into each type of school for it to be meaningful. Elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools have different risk profiles both to COVID and in general. Edited July 16, 2020 by ramssuperbowl99 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Just now, theJ said: No i don't think so. Just a perspective as to how many kids die each year. If 0.02% sticks across the board, COVID wouldn't just be a drop in the bucket. It would be a leading cause of deaths for children. Yeah, it would've been good for him to explain his stance. Just dropping a graph and then "perspective" leads it up to interpretation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Quitcher bitchin' https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-tests-show-canadian-made-mask-deactivates-99-sars-cov-2-virus Carry on..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 Just now, TVScout said: Info in the link states there have been 7667 children under the age of ten tested positive. It also indicates none have died. .02% of the kids from 1-18 have died. What is your point? Just spit it out dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted July 16, 2020 Share Posted July 16, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, MookieMonstah said: Yeah, it would've been good for him to explain his stance. Just dropping a graph and then "perspective" leads it up to interpretation. He's done this before too. That plot from JHU he posted was misleading. It wasn't raw numbers, it was a ratio of the new cases/deaths compared to April 1 (why that date was chosen is beyond me), and there was no confirmation that the lag in deaths was accounted for. Edited July 16, 2020 by ramssuperbowl99 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts