AlexGreen#20 Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Nick_gb said: Don't look at the immediate impact of a 2021 trade - look at the contract it would create for a team looking for a QB and how enticing that may be for that team when it comes to trade compensation. That's the part I found most interesting and plausible. Certainly didn't care for the $5 million in savings for next year lol. You're not losing anything by waiting another year in terms of trade value though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, vegas492 said: Regarding the cap....isn't there so room with Z's contract? Like convert salary to signing bonus and spread it out some? I thought that was kind of an easy contract to do that with. ...if we are looking at freeing up every dollar that we can. Like 4 million-ish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 12 hours ago, HeresAGuy said: I think Seattle is going to break the bank for him. Way more than we will be willing to pay. They wanted him bad in that draft. Nothing more than a hunch, but I think they pounce on him. I mean, Seattle wanted King so bad that they traded down from 26 and then again at 31? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick_gb Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, JBURGE said: I mean, Seattle wanted King so bad that they traded down from 26 and then again at 31? I don't even believe that "want" was actually anything more than people knowing that SEA likes big corners. It was your classic throw **** at a wall and hope it sticks type reporting. Edited November 16, 2020 by Nick_gb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemike778 Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 Good news. Means Linsley and King are gone though in all likelihood. I can see Jones as 50/50 now. The other problem will come in 21 with Adams. We can't lose him but very wary of paying him what he truly deserves. With two monster contracts in the offense to ageing players, not sure you can give a third one especially given Adams is getting more and more niggly injuries. Might come down to whether we finally get a receiver in the draft. The Rodgers trade article is pure clickbait nonsense. Before the season started, the consensus was that there was a reasonable chance Rodgers would never return to elite form and hope Love would be ready earlier than thought. Even considering that people were forecasting 2022 as the change-over. So now Rodgers is back to elite QB levels and Love is QB3, you are going to bring that forward a year because Rodgers has trade value. Ok then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, mikemike778 said: niggly Sir this is 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Kepler said: Sir this is 2020 Lol he said this a couple weeks ago I'm almost positive I made this exact reply Edit: might not have been the same poster, just assuming Edited November 16, 2020 by Norm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 16, 2020 Author Share Posted November 16, 2020 8 hours ago, vegas492 said: Regarding the cap....isn't there so room with Z's contract? Like convert salary to signing bonus and spread it out some? I thought that was kind of an easy contract to do that with. ...if we are looking at freeing up every dollar that we can. In theory, they could do that with a number of players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 King finally gets over the quad injury and now he has an Achilles issue- STFU! He is now know from this point forward as Mr. Glass... I wouldn't sign Mr. Glass to anything other than a vet minimum deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Bakhtiari contract On phone and can't get the column titles to view as black text. YEAR AGE BASE SALARY SIGNING ROSTER WORKOUT CAP HIT DEAD CAP YEARLY CASH 2020 28 $6,052,941 $9,200,000 $500,000 $500,000 $16,252,941 $64,700,000 $37,052,941($37,052,941) 2021 29 $1,075,000 $6,000,000 $11,572,000 $800,000 $19,447,000 $49,447,059 $13,447,000($50,499,941) 2022 30 $3,200,000 $6,000,000 $10,000,000 $800,000 $20,000,000 $31,000,000 $14,000,000($64,499,941) POTENTIAL OUT: 2023, 3 YR, $64,499,941; $12,000,000 DEAD CAP 2023 31 $6,700,000 $6,000,000 $10,000,000 $800,000 $23,500,000 $12,000,000 $17,500,000($81,999,941) 2024 32 $10,700,000 $6,000,000 $10,000,000 $800,000 $27,500,000 $6,000,000 $21,500,000($103,499,941) MOD EDIT: Fixed it for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 58 minutes ago, squire12 said: Bakhtiari contract Overall, a pretty healthy contract. I believe this raised his cap hit from $10.3M this year to $16.3M. After the 2022 season is really the first time the Packers could get out of the deal, which means they'd have pay him 2 years, $57M if they released him. He's probably going to be a Packer though the 2023 season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Overall, a pretty healthy contract. I believe this raised his cap hit from $10.3M this year to $16.3M. After the 2022 season is really the first time the Packers could get out of the deal, which means they'd have pay him 2 years, $57M if they released him. He's probably going to be a Packer though the 2023 season. I think that is accurate. Puts GB at around $17M over the reported $175M cap in 2021. GB going to need to reshuffle some money for 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 Just now, squire12 said: I think that is accurate. Puts GB at around $17M over the reported $175M cap in 2021. GB going to need to reshuffle some money for 2021 They're not going to have a $175M cap, I feel fairly confident on that one. Probably going to happen similar to what happened in the NBA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, CWood21 said: They're not going to have a $175M cap, I feel fairly confident on that one. Probably going to happen similar to what happened in the NBA. I agree on the 175. Been saying they will borrow from future years. Both sides best interest is a more flat cap for 1-2 years, then a jump back to more normal growth. Can you elaborate on what the NBA did? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 22, 2020 Author Share Posted November 22, 2020 1 minute ago, squire12 said: I agree on the 175. Been saying they will borrow from future years. Both sides best interest is a more flat cap for 1-2 years, then a jump back to more normal growth. Can you elaborate on what the NBA did? Long story short, they're borrowing money from future years to make up for the lost income this year. Basically, you'll see the salary cap go up slower than it would otherwise until it pays off the deficit. They've got the same salary cap as the previous season for the upcoming season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.