Jump to content

Missed Connections: WRs, what are they and how can we get some? {The Shrine of Jefferson}


EaglesPeteC

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, EaglesFlySBChampsHigh said:

This sounds like last year all over again. 

 

I hope not but I personally had Lamb, Jefferson and Jeudy as my Top 3 last year. I wanted nothing to do with Ruggs. So when they didn't trade up for Lamb and then didn't draft Jefferson. Oy. So I hope they don't make that mistake again. Waddle will likely go mid to late in the 1st round. If I were the Jets I would trade out the #2 pick, get a haul and draft Waddle with their second first round pick to add weapons for their QB. 

I like Smith and Chase  A LOT though. Both will do well in Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ACO said:

 

I hope not but I personally had Lamb, Jefferson and Jeudy as my Top 3 last year. I wanted nothing to do with Ruggs. So when they didn't trade up for Lamb and then didn't draft Jefferson. Oy. So I hope they don't make that mistake again. Waddle will likely go mid to late in the 1st round. If I were the Jets I would trade out the #2 pick, get a haul and draft Waddle with their second first round pick to add weapons for their QB. 

I like Smith and Chase  A LOT though. Both will do well in Philly.

I had Lamb above all too. I liked Jefferson over Jeudy and ruggs too . Something about Jeudy and Ruggs scared me off from LOVING them. Plus for Alabama sake.. I been in love with D.Smith for a couple years now. I wished he came out last year so we could steal him. 

I'm on the Draft Smith train this year. I'll be happy with any of the top 3 at the end of the day. We need playmakers period. Wether that's at 6 or a slight trade down for Waddle

Edited by EaglesFlySBChampsHigh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The obvious choice for us at 6 is one of the top 3 WRs. I don't think that is set is stone and our first rd pick could reflect the new HC's philosophy towards whatever style they want to bring/create here. Is there realistically anyone else we could take at 6 that wouldn't be considered a reach? Honestly I would be totally fine with trading down into the mid 1st and drafting a LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oland11 said:

The obvious choice for us at 6 is one of the top 3 WRs. I don't think that is set is stone and our first rd pick could reflect the new HC's philosophy towards whatever style they want to bring/create here. Is there realistically anyone else we could take at 6 that wouldn't be considered a reach? Honestly I would be totally fine with trading down into the mid 1st and drafting a LB.

Not it's not - Jaylen Waddle is not worth the #6 overall pick in the draft. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EagleBlueDon said:
14 minutes ago, ACO said:

It will be WR or DB at #6, IMO.

Boy I hope you're right. And I hope it's between Smith, Chase, Surtain and Farley. Hey we can be excited about corners now that Jim's gone.

Theoretically we can't mess it up.

At 6 we should have at least one of Chase, Smith or Surtain. We can move down 2-3 and still potentially get one them, Parsons, Farley. 
Or we can trade way back and get a ton of picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...