Week 2 GDT: Texans at Browns

[Kiwibrown]

I think there are some compliments we can give to houston. They were well coached, if they can get some more talent they will be a good team. 

We probably lose of they had Watson out there.

[JDD]

13 minutes ago, Reginaldm9 said:

Show the hot elf again you cowards

I said the same thing 

[sdrawkcab321]

1 minute ago, Kiwibrown said:

I think there are some compliments we can give to houston. They were well coached, if they can get some more talent they will be a good team. 

We probably lose of they had Watson out there.

We probably lose if Tyrod was still out there

[buno67]

1 minute ago, Kiwibrown said:

I think there are some compliments we can give to houston. They were well coached, if they can get some more talent they will be a good team. 

We probably lose of they had Watson out there.

Feel like they approach this game a lot differently if they have Watson. Seemed like they weren’t taking them serious. 
 

our DL is garbage IMO, at least compared to what the expectations were. Garrett and Clowney have been a disappointment so far as a duo

[candyman93]

We might win the division despite the defense being trash.

[JDD]

17 minutes ago, buno67 said:

Feel like they approach this game a lot differently if they have Watson. Seemed like they weren’t taking them serious. 
 

our DL is garbage IMO, at least compared to what the expectations were. Garrett and Clowney have been a disappointment so far as a duo

Teams are scheming against it.  The back 7 need to make a play

 

Delpit has a great strip sack and I thought Woods needed to make pressure if 4 aren’t getting there. Tunsil goes down and they don’t take advantage of that??

[MWil23]

I’m concerned if Jarvis is going to miss an extended amount of time.

[candyman93]

We got a really tough test next week against Chicago’s defense.

[LETSGOBROWNIES]

 

18 minutes ago, buno67 said:

our DL is garbage IMO, at least compared to what the expectations were.
 

I guess it depends on your expectations.

Looking at this objectively, other than Garrett we have an UFA and 4 guys who are on one year “prove it”/stopgap deals.

18 minutes ago, buno67 said:

Garrett and Clowney have been a disappointment so far as a duo

I disagree, they’ve been more or less as advertised imo.

[LETSGOBROWNIES]

Just now, candyman93 said:

We got a really tough test next week against Chicago’s defense.

And our defense has a tough test too with an opposing offense.

[candyman93]

2 minutes ago, MWil23 said:

I’m concerned if Jarvis is going to miss an extended amount of time.

MCL sprain

[candyman93]

1 minute ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said:

And our defense has a tough test too with an opposing offense.

It’s probably going to be Justin Fields first start.

[candyman93]

For @Reginaldm9

 

https://m.imgur.com/xW5dHAr

[LETSGOBROWNIES]

2 minutes ago, candyman93 said:

It’s probably going to be Justin Fields first start.

Someone better email Woods a pic or description of a blitz and spy or it’s gonna be a long day.

[DawgX]

8 minutes ago, JDD said:

Teams are scheming against it.  The back 7 need to make a play

 

Delpit has a great strip sack and I thought Woods needed to make pressure if 4 aren’t getting there. Tunsil goes down and they don’t take advantage of that??

I think he was back out there right at the start of the second half. So basically he just missed a few plays when the Texans were just trying to melt the clock anyway.