Thaiphoon Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 What Would You Do? KC is in need of a WR after trading Hill away. If they came calling for our #11 pick and offered their two firsts (#29 and #30) Would you take that deal? For me, even though the draft values are similar, I would need at least another pick (2nd or 3rd in 2023 thrown in, maybe?). But if a guy I really wanted was still there, I'm not sure right now if I'd do it. But am interested in your thoughts. Would you? Or not? Or what else would it take to get you to move down to #29 and #30? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar703 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I wouldn’t. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slappy Mc Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 (edited) 100% I would. I'd take that to the bank. *edit* I'll edit to share why. It is at that point, two first round picks that you can take a player for need (ie MLB, G, FS) and also take a developmental QB that falls (while locking in the 5th year option). You also could just go need at both spots. Any combination of MLB,G,FS,WR,CB. I think getting another pick would be better, but if someone offers me two firsts this draft for #11, I'm taking it. Edited March 24, 2022 by Slappy Mc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I'd do that deal. There's depth in this draft, and getting two very solid guys at the end of the round would be great. Walking away with two of Zion Johnson (G), George Pickens (WR), Andrew Booth (CB), Jahan Dotson (WR), etc. or if you're feeling spicy and hate Wentz, you can take one of these QBs at the end of the first and get a 5th year (Howell, Ridder, Corral, etc) along with one of these talents. To be extra greedy though I might ask for their 4th and give back a 6th. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 1 hour ago, lavar703 said: I wouldn’t. What if Olave is gone? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaiphoon Posted March 24, 2022 Author Share Posted March 24, 2022 1 hour ago, lavar703 said: I wouldn’t. How about if GB offered #22 and #28? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I’d take the deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceinthehouse Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Thai, I would take the deal without blinking. Their 29 & 30…? Absolutely For 11...you bet. The draft is a crapshoot, Thai And 2 is better than 1. Specially when the draft doesn't have the top blue chip talent that most drafts have. Thai, if I told you I will trade My Mercedes convertible & my Tuscan for your 1 vehicle? Would you do it? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rizzy Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I wouldn't do it for the KC deal I would do it if they added a 3rd since we don't have ours and seem to be decent picking there. I would take the GB deal because I want to get one of the top 5 receivers and one should be there. I would also be more inclined to take the trade if Wilson/Gardner/Hamilton goes before we pick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar703 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 1 hour ago, MikeT14 said: What if Olave is gone? Then yes, I’d consider it. I just think dropping that far is really tough. You start missing out on a lot of talent. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 11 minutes ago, lavar703 said: Then yes, I’d consider it. I just think dropping that far is really tough. You start missing out on a lot of talent. It depends on teams, I get it. It’s like trading the potential of maybe an A/A- guy for two B guys. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripsean21 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 1 hour ago, Thaiphoon said: How about if GB offered #22 and #28? I’d do this deal unless Gardner or Hamilton are there. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I'd do the trade, unless Hamiltion is there who I think is top need/fit of best players. Just hink I'd rather have 2 of WR Pickens/Watson/Moore IOL Linderbaum/Green/Johnson LBer Dean/Chenal CB Booth/Gordon (Know all these won't fall but examples of group that should be at Chiefs pick) Then just Wilson/London/Olave 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offbyone Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 I would take it. I prefer trading down only 10 picks, but you don't always get to choose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceinthehouse Posted March 25, 2022 Share Posted March 25, 2022 I'd also like to add that I'm in the "no" for drafting a WR with our #11 pick. However, I could stomach it much more if Washington was able to trade down with K.C. or G.B. & obtain both of their 1st Rd picks in the later 1st. With 2 shots in the 1st, taking a potential stud at Wideout would not be a bad move. But there have been way too many disappointments with 1st Rd WR's than hits. They're more likely to become Josh Doctson than Justin Jefferson. I mean, our stud #1 WR in Scary Terry? Is a 3rd Rd pick. So all you guys screaming from the rooftops to take Olave or Garrett @11…? It's a huge no from me @11. But not on a trade down for more additional picks. ITs also why I want Julio Jones and his old ***. I'd rather have an old HOFer with 1 foot out the door, than a WR who will never enter that door. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.