Norm Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, beekay414 said: UCLA really down 10 to Bowling Green? They'll probably still cover Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 (edited) Damn I'm going to go 0-3 early lol. Thought UNC had App S and now they're coming back. Lame Edit: or if Iowa can get 3 more safeties! Edited September 3, 2022 by Norm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Just now, Norm said: I mean, I was a D2 athlete and the son of a D2 coach. I've never once before today thought, wow they end up laying on the field way more often that stops games. There's no data out there but I'd bet a bit there's not a huge disparity. But anyways, not worth me arguing about, just never thought about it before I still don’t think you’re understanding what I’m saying. But I’m right: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274115/ There is a greater injury risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 On the one hand they killed the game with a run. On the other hand it was a ******* draw. Half run at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, Norm said: Oh okay, I thought you meant just straight up like they end up hurt more often, I'm sure they take more injuries than their FBS opponents, no doubt. No, sorry yeah miscommunication. D1 compared to 2-3 is much more prevalent for the latter. Check out the link I sent with the data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NateDawg Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 (edited) I still think Hafley is a fantastic coach but the momentum isn’t going how I was expecting it to for him at Boston College. Rutgers winning today isn’t great. I do think it’s highly possible in the ACC though they’re a top 4-5 team. Edited September 3, 2022 by NateDawg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Just now, MWil23 said: No, sorry yeah miscommunication. D1 compared to 2-3 is much more prevalent for the latter. Check out the link I sent with the data. You win because there's no way I'm going to read that lol It makes sense, I've just never thought of it being something really obvious and noticeable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Perspective: Today by 10:30 AM I got in a 40+ minute cardio workout and 8,500 steps. Since Iowa came on total step count: 9,100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dante9876 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Iowa unders again this year I see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 C'mon SDSU pick 6. Come to butt head Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 1 minute ago, Norm said: You win because there's no way I'm going to read that lol It makes sense, I've just never thought of it being something really obvious and noticeable. Results: Over the 5 years studied, DII and DIII programs reported 252 BSIs more than 1,793,777 AEs (14.05 per 100,000 AEs), and DI programs reported 235 BSIs over 2,022,592 AEs (11.62 per 100,000 AEs). The risk ratio was significant for D1 versus DII and DIII (1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.44). There was a significant difference in time lost to injury in DI versus DII and DIII, χ2(5, n = 449) = 16.54; P = .006. When data were stratified by individual sport, there were no significant divisional differences in high-risk sports. Conclusion: In the current study, NCAA DII and DIII athletes had higher rates of BSI than their DI counterparts. As compared with DII and DIII athletes, the DI athletes had a significantly greater proportion of BSIs that did not result in absence from participation in sport. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 **** it, go jacks. Embarass these fools Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Just now, MWil23 said: When data were stratified by individual sport, there were no significant divisional differences in high-risk sports. That's weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beekay414 Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 This SDSU QB has no idea how to throw a football lol. Kinda integral to your position, dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NateDawg Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 (edited) OK never mind SDSU is way too tricky to join the BiG. Edited September 3, 2022 by NateDawg 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.