MacReady Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 The days without a trade counter thread that doubles as a taking bets and bragging rights thread. My official prediction? The Packers trade for nobody every day from here until after you can’t do it anymore anyway. Five years from now, a 6th round draft pick that would have been used in a trade has a 7 sack season in his third year, thus justifying that decision. The last trade the Packers made to acquire a player was September 4th, 2021. The Packers received Corey B. A punter. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 We're getting obj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 (edited) OH BOY!!! You fellas ready to be "in the conversation"??? I can't wait. Edited October 18, 2022 by packfanfb 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Frankly, let me add that if we don't beat Washington on Sunday, I'm firmly against trading for anyone, in fact, we should be sellers. If we beat Washington, we are still very likely looking at 4-4 after Buffalo when the trade deadline arrives, but we'd still have a shot at the playoffs if we could win 6 of our last 9. I think 10-7 would get us a wildcard spot, not sure about 9-8. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted October 18, 2022 Author Share Posted October 18, 2022 35 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Frankly, let me add that if we don't beat Washington on Sunday, I'm firmly against trading for anyone, in fact, we should be sellers. If we beat Washington, we are still very likely looking at 4-4 after Buffalo when the trade deadline arrives, but we'd still have a shot at the playoffs if we could win 6 of our last 9. I think 10-7 would get us a wildcard spot, not sure about 9-8. Buccaneers started 3-2. Chiefs started 4-2, 5-3, 6-4. Patriots started 1-2. Lots of precedent for Super Bowl winners having ugly starts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted October 18, 2022 Author Share Posted October 18, 2022 51 minutes ago, Norm said: We're getting obj That’s not a trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 7 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: That’s not a trade. I'm aware. It's why we're not going to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 18 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Buccaneers started 3-2. Chiefs started 4-2, 5-3, 6-4. Patriots started 1-2. Lots of precedent for Super Bowl winners having ugly starts. Right, but none of those are 3-5 which is what we're staring at if we lose to Wash. Plus a tough schedule after that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: OH BOY!!! You fellas ready to be "in the conversation"??? I can't wait. Regardless of the Packers history, I trust zero rumors/suggestions about Pittsburgh WRs considering Diontae Johnson was supposed to be a goner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 29 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: That’s not a trade. No we are going to trade a 2nd and 4th to free agency for OBJ. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 I actually feel like we're really gonna trade for Claypool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 3 minutes ago, incognito_man said: I actually feel like we're really gonna trade for Claypool. If we truly are interested, get ready for a bidding war with KC. They just restructured Kelce's contract to open up another $3.5 mil and I guarantee that's for a move at WR. Normally I'd say we'd have the advantage there given NFC vs. AFC, but the Steelers just traded Ingram to KC last season so there's history there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: Frankly, let me add that if we don't beat Washington on Sunday, I'm firmly against trading for anyone, in fact, we should be sellers. If we beat Washington, we are still very likely looking at 4-4 after Buffalo when the trade deadline arrives, but we'd still have a shot at the playoffs if we could win 6 of our last 9. I think 10-7 would get us a wildcard spot, not sure about 9-8. What pieces do we sell? Maybe someone wants Rasul? We can't trade: Rodgers, Bakhtiari, Clark, Preston, Jaire, Jones, Campbell, Quay, Wyatt, or Watson. There is not enough cap space. Someone want to buy low on Jenkins or Yosh? Maybe Dillon, but why? I can't imagine that there is a bigger market for Love right now than there would have been in the offseason. What exactly are we moving? I do half agree though. If we do lose to Washington and Buffalo, we shouldn't be buyers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: Frankly, let me add that if we don't beat Washington on Sunday, I'm firmly against trading for anyone, in fact, we should be sellers. If we beat Washington, we are still very likely looking at 4-4 after Buffalo when the trade deadline arrives, but we'd still have a shot at the playoffs if we could win 6 of our last 9. I think 10-7 would get us a wildcard spot, not sure about 9-8. I could see the team trading for someone even more than now if they lose to wash, as a desperation move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Just now, Gopackgonerd said: I could see the team trading for someone even more than now if they lose to wash, as a desperation move. That's what I'm afraid of, and personally that philosophy makes no sense to me. You trade for a guy when you're in the position we were in the last 3 years, i.e. when you're already at the top. Just my 2 cents. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.