SteelKing728 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Detroit can just keep Swift and be salty about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 18 minutes ago, wcblack34 said: Or it tells your fanbase that you're willing to do whatever it takes to get it right. it tells everyone that you’re inept. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wcblack34 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 25 minutes ago, SemperFeist said: it tells everyone that you’re inept. I disagree. Everyone agrees that Quarterback is the most important position in sports. Getting two top prospects to battle it out isn’t a bad thing. If their egos are too fragile to handle the competition, they were never going to be the guy anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swede700 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 13 minutes ago, wcblack34 said: I disagree. Everyone agrees that Quarterback is the most important position in sports. Getting two top prospects to battle it out isn’t a bad thing. If their egos are too fragile to handle the competition, they were never going to be the guy anyway. Even if you believe that's the case, that's extremely poor use of resources. It's one thing to use a 1st and a 4th on a QB, like the Washington team did, but a whole other thing to use your first 2 picks on them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemperFeist Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 (edited) 42 minutes ago, wcblack34 said: I disagree. Everyone agrees that Quarterback is the most important position in sports. Getting two top prospects to battle it out isn’t a bad thing. If their egos are too fragile to handle the competition, they were never going to be the guy anyway. There’s a finite number of snaps available in practice. If you’re drafting two QBs with the intention for them to battle it out, you’re doing both a disservice. Also, you’re just about guaranteed to destroy the locker room. Half the locker room is going to get behind one guy, while the other half gets behind the other. Every time one guy slips up, the other side is going to start to make noise. And the fans would do the same thing. You’re more likely to ruin any chance at developing either one of them, than to find the one who’s going to be good. Edited April 28, 2023 by SemperFeist 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrplChilPill Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 nfl.com has MN taking Hooker..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wcblack34 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 7 minutes ago, PrplChilPill said: nfl.com has MN taking Hooker..... In the third? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrplChilPill Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, wcblack34 said: In the third? Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wcblack34 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 3 minutes ago, PrplChilPill said: Yes Yuck. Better than in the first, I suppose...but still a waste of a pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 hour ago, SemperFeist said: There’s a finite number of snaps available in practice. If you’re drafting two QBs with the intention for them to battle it out, you’re doing both a disservice. Also, you’re just about guaranteed to destroy the locker room. Half the locker room is going to get behind one guy, while the other half gets behind the other. Every time one guy slips up, the other side is going to start to make noise. And the fans would do the same thing. You’re more likely to ruin any chance at developing either one of them, than to find the one who’s going to be good. It worked for Kirk Cousins though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 hour ago, PrplChilPill said: nfl.com has MN taking Hooker..... Eww. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vikes22 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 58 minutes ago, PrplChilPill said: nfl.com has MN taking Hooker..... That would be a great pick. Trade Smith and Cook tonight and that would be a huge win. Let Hooker sit a learn for a year. Go into next by locking up T.J. and Jefferson to extensions. ( and anyone else that’s up for extensions) Have a decent amount of cap for Free Agents and hope hit on a few draft picks. Then we are ready to roll. Sound good to me😎. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad People Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 I wouldnt mind Hooker for a 3rd round pick but would prefer they focus on the defense. CB IDL LB In that order of preference 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boda Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Just somehow bring me Porter Jr or Ringo along with Gervon Dexter & DeMarvion Overshown & I think they're good to go. Or atleast i'll be happy 😎 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrplChilPill Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 People are willing not to take any defensive starters this draft? Wow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.