MaximusGluteus Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 4 hours ago, Packerraymond said: I hate that we need multiple safeties. Nothing worse than scouting safeties. If you don't have A22, don't bother. If you do, here's a typical evaluation. 60% no bearing on the play whatsoever 20-25% I think he executed the scheme as called, but not sure 10% I think he ****ed up, but not sure 5-10% Oooh, cool splash play For sure. I've been trying to find some useful film on Trey Taylor from Air Force (this year's Jim Thorpe award winner) but it feels hopeless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 4 hours ago, gopackgo972 said: I feel like nobody does mocks anymore. Just give this forum about a month. Once the combine/FA get here it's mock city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Striker said: Just give this forum about a month. Once the combine/FA get here it's mock city. Yup, I'm waiting until combine/RAS scores for mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 53 minutes ago, Sandy said: Yup, I'm waiting until combine/RAS scores for mine. I'm waiting until I know enough not to embarrass myself, so don't hold your breath for mine! LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgwingman Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Sandy said: Yup, I'm waiting until combine/RAS scores for mine. Yeah it's a weird coincidence. For 90% of teams in the league, you can't use combine measurements. But the Packers do seem to prefer drafted players meet certain athletic thresholds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spilltray Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Personally I've never even started looking at prospects until after the super bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, pgwingman said: Yeah it's a weird coincidence. For 90% of teams in the league, you can't use combine measurements. But the Packers do seem to prefer drafted players meet certain athletic thresholds I don't believe this to be true. I believe most teams are looking for the best athletes that fit their system. You run a 4.7 as a CB, there aren't too many teams who still have you on their board after the combine. The Packers may stick to this to a greater degree than some, but it is nowhere near 90%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 7 hours ago, gopackgo972 said: I feel like nobody does mocks anymore. You can follow Mel Kiper's until more pop up on here 😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isherwood Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Here’s a 3 round PFF one (I don’t pay for PFF) This is all pending combine/pro day stuff, but I can see Gute going to the bulldog well again for Lassiter. Cooper is probably going higher than this. He’s ILB1 and an absolute monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 20 minutes ago, Isherwood said: Here’s a 3 round PFF one (I don’t pay for PFF) This is all pending combine/pro day stuff, but I can see Gute going to the bulldog well again for Lassiter. Cooper is probably going higher than this. He’s ILB1 and an absolute monster. I'm pretty big on Cooper .. would be an awesome pick at #41 or #57, but if he has a great combine he's probably going in round one. I think ILB is a bigger need than most. Campbell looks cooked, and Quay and McDuffie have their warts. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persiandud Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 biggest needs - the spine of our defense needs work. linebacker, slot corner, 2 safeties. wouldn't mind signing a safety and then drafting one, but we need to bring in 2 and take that position group seriously not a big need but upgradeable - LT (Bahktiari is a big decision), RB2 never hurts to add more - edge, WR (if it's a clear value for an alpha, none of our current WRs are WR1 types) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persiandud Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 I was going to say Terrion Arnold is someone I'd like at 25 but it looks like he's going top 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgwingman Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 10 hours ago, Old Guy said: I don't believe this to be true. I believe most teams are looking for the best athletes that fit their system. You run a 4.7 as a CB, there aren't too many teams who still have you on their board after the combine. The Packers may stick to this to a greater degree than some, but it is nowhere near 90%. We'll I'll put it this way. I downloaded all the RAS scores for each draft class and did some sorting. The Packers have the 6th highest RAS score over the last 5 years, and the 2nd highest RAS score over the last 10 years. Their minimum RAS score over the last 10 years was 6.49, which was the 3rd highest. So I don't the Packers draft solely on athleticism, but I'd argue their athletic thresholds are higher than league averages. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KQvpP1WrRWF2rjp03usF8vBxo2WSbfBYRhMsUydWrQk/edit?usp=sharing Avg (10 year) Avg (5 year) Minimum Packers 7.957 8.064 6.49 League 7.266 7.705 5.704 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor1124 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 10 hours ago, Isherwood said: Here’s a 3 round PFF one (I don’t pay for PFF) This is all pending combine/pro day stuff, but I can see Gute going to the bulldog well again for Lassiter. Cooper is probably going higher than this. He’s ILB1 and an absolute monster. If we feel pretty good about Walker at LT or by some slim chance Bakh coming back, I like this draft a lot position wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReasonablySober Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 I don't think this is remotely realistic, but I'd be pretty happy to add a handful of my top options without needing to trade up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts