Jump to content

Stalking Rodgers


Brit Pack

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said:

Aaron wanted to debate him or some crap.  Jesus H, just play football!  Rodgers is like the ultra distraction.  I bet if you asked just about every single person in the Packers organization they would tell you that they are glad he's gone.

Maybe not Bakh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Packerraymond said:

He was directly asked about it, he didn't put it out there for the world to see. He wouldn't have brought it up had he never been asked. 

Because he was walking around unmasked and then he sidestepped like his usual self. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, incognito_man said:

And now let's compare that to Kirk Cousins to decide what take is more likely.

How many issues did Kirk have?

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/kirk-cousins-covid-twitter-responds/

https://www.twincities.com/2021/08/31/ex-qb-josh-mccown-says-vikings-kirk-cousins-not-being-vaccinated-takes-away-from-some-of-your-ability-to-lead/

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10009835-hospital-ends-relationship-with-kirk-cousins-over-qbs-covid-19-vaccine-stance

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/why-wont-kirk-cousins-get-vaccinated

"Then again, Cousins is taking an extreme and irrational position. Maybe the Vikings should fight fire with fire, and move on from a guy who clearly has no future in Minnesota beyond the expiration of his contract in two seasons, if he makes it that long."

https://www.startribune.com/vikings-vaccination-status-mike-zimmer-kirk-cousins-quarterbacks-covid/600083997/

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, incognito_man said:

And now let's compare that to Kirk Cousins to decide what take is more likely.

How many issues did Kirk have?

It cost Cole Beasley his job. You can't pretend there wasn't a lynch mob out to get those who did not want the vaccine. 

Not agreeing with Rodgers answer, but we aren't going to re-write history here either. 

Still don't think this needs to be re-hashed again. 

Bottom line, people should get to choose what they put in their body. I'd think in the aftermath, it's pretty obvious that should have been the case the case all along. 

I'm not for or against anyone based on that personal choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beekay414 said:

Because he was walking around unmasked and then he sidestepped like his usual self. 

HE didn't put it out there. There's not an argument that you can make that he did. He was asked about it and sidestepped, but he didn't want it out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Packerraymond said:

HE didn't put it out there. There's not an argument that you can make that he did. He was asked about it and sidestepped, but he didn't want it out there. 

Again, he was walking around the building unmasked and doing things with the vaccinated group of players. You (and him) are naive if you didn't think the question was coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, beekay414 said:

Again, he was walking around the building unmasked and doing things with the vaccinated group of players. You (and him) are naive if you didn't think the question was coming.

Yes the question coming means that someone else caused the information to get out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

And what about in 2023?

Does anybody care about it now?

That's the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Old Guy said:

It cost Cole Beasley his job. You can't pretend there wasn't a lynch mob out to get those who did not want the vaccine. 

Not agreeing with Rodgers answer, but we aren't going to re-write history here either. 

Still don't think this needs to be re-hashed again. 

Bottom line, people should get to choose what they put in their body. I'd think in the aftermath, it's pretty obvious that should have been the case the case all along. 

I'm not for or against anyone based on that personal choice. 

The bottom line is that's it's a personal choice that affects everyone else.

Stop simplifying it. It's not accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Packerraymond said:

HE didn't put it out there. There's not an argument that you can make that he did. He was asked about it and sidestepped, but he didn't want it out there. 

It's relevant information to the team due to the rules imparted by the league.

It was 100% a legitimate question and he chose to be dishonest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, incognito_man said:

And what about in 2023?

Does anybody care about it now?

That's the point.

Not sure what that has to do with 2020, Kirk got roasted for coming out with it (because he tested positive otherwise he would've never come out with it), Rodgers being the overly-sensitive to criticism guy he is would have never exposed his vaccination status to avoid that criticism and when directly questioned about it, misled the media to avoid said criticism. 

There is no possible argument for BK being correct. Rodgers didn't want anyone to know his status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Packerraymond said:

Not sure what that has to do with 2020, Kirk got roasted for coming out with it (because he tested positive otherwise he would've never come out with it), Rodgers being the overly-sensitive to criticism guy he is would have never exposed his vaccination status to avoid that criticism and when directly questioned about it, misled the media to avoid said criticism. 

There is no possible argument for BK being correct. Rodgers didn't want anyone to know his status.

I don't think bk (or anyone) is disagreeing that he didn't want it out there.

I'm not sure what your point is here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...