Scoundrel Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 28 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said: ICBR votes Do they though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 2 hours ago, RuskieTitan said: So the chaos option eliminates 2b for me. Someone else pitch me on the other options 2A is a smaller increase (7180) and is basically 2B without the further increases. 2C is a slightly larger increase (7500) so should be able to stand for a little longer before we need to do this again. So a difference of 320 as a descending starting point. Edited January 14 by SirA1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 On 1/3/2024 at 1:52 PM, TedLavie said: Proposal #5 - New RFA Tag Starting the 2025 off-season, Introduce the RFA+ Tag. The RFA+ Tag will cost the same as the number one pick would cost for that year to tag but would result in the tagger receiving a 1st and 4th round pick as compensation if choosing to not match the offered contract. What's the tag for 1.1? Rule book says 3500 for first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 15 Author Share Posted January 15 1 minute ago, RuskieTitan said: What's the tag for 1.1? Rule book says 3500 for first Whatever the new adjustment is. This won’t take place until 2025 when the draft pick cap also goes up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 On 1/3/2024 at 1:52 PM, TedLavie said: Proposal #5 - New RFA Tag Starting the 2025 off-season, Introduce the RFA+ Tag. The RFA+ Tag will cost the same as the number one pick would cost for that year to tag but would result in the tagger receiving a 1st and 4th round pick as compensation if choosing to not match the offered contract. ICBR votes No. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Prop 5 is rejected. Prop 2c is rejected. Per what has been said in thread, I've moved bcb to a No and SirA & MD4L to a 2a. @RuskieTitan @WFLukic we still need your vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 If by Tuesday night there's still no majority, I'll remove the lowest voted option between 2A and 2B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 3 hours ago, TedLavie said: Prop 5 is rejected. Prop 2c is rejected. Per what has been said in thread, I've moved bcb to a No and SirA & MD4L to a 2a. @RuskieTitan @WFLukic we still need your vote. why was it rejected? had multiple people saying they were still looking into 2a vs 2c Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 meh, 2a then if mine is officially rejected. I don't want onward to be a thing so I can try to make a nice sensible pay scale again next year instead of the random jumping around that will be used Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 3 hours ago, bcb1213 said: why was it rejected? had multiple people saying they were still looking into 2a vs 2c On 1/14/2024 at 5:42 PM, TedLavie said: So Proposal 2 is a mess. End of today, whichever option has the least votes is off and I'll ask people who voted for it to change their votes - if they didn't already. I already know bcb is a 2C -> no SirA and MD4L are a 2C -> 2A Scoundrel is everything but a no Pete doesn't care PR is a 2B -> 2A Blue and I are a 2B -> no @Scoundrel start the league as planned. We don't need this issue solved to start the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 6 minutes ago, TedLavie said: seems like a singular arbitrary decision, but ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Just now, bcb1213 said: seems like a singular arbitrary decision, but ok Had to move on. I left people two days to move their vote. I even tagged Rags and rackcs to see if they wanted to switch before that. If the vote was going to swing towards 2C, it would have happened already Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 2 minutes ago, TedLavie said: Had to move on. I left people two days to move their vote. I even tagged Rags and rackcs to see if they wanted to switch before that. If the vote was going to swing towards 2C, it would have happened already I said I'd vote yes to either 2A or 2C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 7 hours ago, TedLavie said: Prop 5 is rejected. Prop 2c is rejected. Per what has been said in thread, I've moved bcb to a No and SirA & MD4L to a 2a. @RuskieTitan @WFLukic we still need your vote. Vote No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 (edited) With only Lukic left to vote, 2B can't win so it's rejected. I'm switching to a no, so is Blue. @PR you're switching to 2A? If so that's 9 votes Edited January 15 by TedLavie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.