TankWilliams Posted July 29 Share Posted July 29 (edited) nvm 12 hours ago, Ty21 said: Nooo what was it Edited July 29 by TankWilliams 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted July 29 Share Posted July 29 10 minutes ago, TankWilliams said: nvm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 Typical Bears Tax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbear72 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 23 minutes ago, Madmike90 said: Typical Bears Tax Who would you argue should be graded higher when you look at the entire landscape of the NFL? I would definitely say Sweat. Maybe a slight boost to Moore but besides that I wouldn't call this a Bears Tax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 6 minutes ago, Bigbear72 said: Who would you argue should be graded higher when you look at the entire landscape of the NFL? I would definitely say Sweat. Maybe a slight boost to Moore but besides that I wouldn't call this a Bears Tax. If Jaire Alexander is a 93, Johnson should be a 94. In reality, Alexander should be an 88-89 and Johnson should be 91-92 Otherwise I agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbear72 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 2 minutes ago, beardown3231 said: If Jaire Alexander is a 93, Johnson should be a 94. In reality, Alexander should be an 88-89 and Johnson should be 91-92 Otherwise I agree Missed JJ. I agree with you there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 9 minutes ago, Bigbear72 said: Who would you argue should be graded higher when you look at the entire landscape of the NFL? I would definitely say Sweat. Maybe a slight boost to Moore but besides that I wouldn't call this a Bears Tax. Allen is good but Moore is just a flat out better player at this stage of their careers...no way he shouldn't be in the 90s...having Sweat & Johnson so low is just flat out nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted August 2 Author Share Posted August 2 Jaire was one of top 2 or 3 CBs in league for a year or two. But he hasn't been that for a bit due to injuries or whatever. JJ had a great season last year. I think Sweat is going to have his break out year this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskieBear Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 2 hours ago, Madmike90 said: Typical Bears Tax Sweat is lower than Chase Young. let that sink in 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmike90 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 2 hours ago, HuskieBear said: Sweat is lower than Chase Young. let that sink in That's why these people work as game developers and not scouts or coaches clearly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBears019 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 If the bears won 3 more games last year all those guys listed would probably be 3-4 points higher. It’s never a true reflection of their individual abilities. Popularity plays a huge role in it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty21 Posted August 3 Share Posted August 3 21 hours ago, Madmike90 said: Typical Bears Tax I won’t get up in arms about this because it’s been a minute since the ratings have been even close and you only get favorable ratings if you’re the cowboys lol. Moore, Johnson, and Sweat are criminal though lol. same players, I’d rate: Sweat 94 Jaylon 93 Moore 93 Allen 89 Byard 82 Swift 81 Edwards 87 Edmunds 83 Kmet 85 Brisker 79 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted August 3 Author Share Posted August 3 15 hours ago, CBears019 said: If the bears won 3 more games last year all those guys listed would probably be 3-4 points higher. It’s never a true reflection of their individual abilities. Popularity plays a huge role in it. I remember same thing happening going all the way back to HS. A school had 4 or 5 great players that truly deserved all conference recognition, but overall team didn’t do well due primarily to coaching and not having a good program. Argument always is how can you have 4 or 5 guys on all conference list when your team wasn’t that good? And they aren’t necessarily wrong. But if there was a player draft I can tell you those 5 guys wouldn’t go after many guys on all conference list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZBearsFan Posted August 4 Share Posted August 4 On 8/2/2024 at 12:10 PM, Madmike90 said: Allen is good but Moore is just a flat out better player at this stage of their careers...no way he shouldn't be in the 90s...having Sweat & Johnson so low is just flat out nonsense. The NFL top 100 omissions of JJ and Moore are more egregious to me. Madden ratings have always been dumb, but there were twenty WRs in the top 100, and Moore wasn’t in there? Coming off a 96-catch, 1300+ yard season? Gimme a break. JJ was 2nd team all pro and not a top 100 player overall? GTFOH. (None of this stuff really matters, and just exists for people to talk about it, but still…) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dll2000 Posted August 4 Author Share Posted August 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.