Kiwibrown Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 Team A Qb is top 15 Lt Joe Thomas LG Larry Allen C Jason Kelce RG Zach Martin RT Trent Williams Wr Julian Edlemen Wr brandin cooks Wr Brandon Lloyd Te Austin Hooper RB Devonta Freeman Team B Qb top 15 LT Nate Solder LG Connor Williams C garrett bradbury RG Austin Corbett RT Mike Mcglinchey Wr Randy Moss Wr Jerry Rice Wr Chad Johnson RB derrick Henry TE rob Gronkowski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonStark Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 I mean, a strong OL is really important but this is easily team B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagahide13 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 (edited) A just to be different and because I don't really know what having 4 elite receivers actually gives you on the field. How many times a game are you throwing? 60? Plus with the offensive line A gives you you can pretty much do anything to anyone. Edited March 31 by nagahide13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CasperX22 Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 The answer is A. What are you throwing 35 times a game? You're targeting each of those receivers at most 8 times a game with quick throws bc you can't hold your blocks and you're getting your QB hit 10 times a game. By week 4 you're signing a QB off the street and hoping they can Joe Flacco it. Team A is basically the 90's Cowboys Team B is basically the 1980 San Diego Chargers give or take lessor QB, better WR, lessor oline 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 The mismatches with B would just be too ridiculous for any defense to handle. Add in Gronk is a better blocker than most tackles with Henry running the rock? Nasty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeezla Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Team B. That OL would still be top 5, just not sure fire #1 like team A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iknowcool Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 How good does an OL need to be when you have the players Team B has? How often is a defense sending more than a 4-man rush vs an offense fielding Rice, Moss, Chad, and Gronk? QB won't need much time in the pocket. Not even taking into consideration having Henry at RB. Maybe if the OL for Team B was even worse, like all-time bad, Team A would have a chance. But assuming everyone is at their peak, it isn't a terrible OL for B. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seminoles1 Posted April 6 Share Posted April 6 On 4/4/2024 at 1:28 PM, iknowcool said: How good does an OL need to be when you have the players Team B has? How often is a defense sending more than a 4-man rush vs an offense fielding Rice, Moss, Chad, and Gronk? QB won't need much time in the pocket. Not even taking into consideration having Henry at RB. Maybe if the OL for Team B was even worse, like all-time bad, Team A would have a chance. But assuming everyone is at their peak, it isn't a terrible OL for B. Yeah, agreed with this. The OL for Team B is still really good IMO. A good OL and all-time weapons >>> good weapons and an all-time OL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelKing728 Posted April 7 Share Posted April 7 I'd rather have the OL that makes everyone else's job easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.