Jump to content

Atlanta/PHI tampering resolution announced, p.7


vike daddy

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SodeeWater_Cheezburger said:

I wonder if he is still mad about the Dirty Birds beating the Vikings in the '98 NFCCG?

Probably is.

1 hour ago, SteelKing728 said:

We'll take your entire draft then and settle it then. 

Thanks Kirko Chainz!

Like this guy probably is^

1 hour ago, Raves said:

So can we call the Falcons one "CousinsGate"?  It just seems fitting.

Better than "We paid for the Catholic Church's criminal defense to protect pedophiles"-gate that the Saints engaged in.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2020/06/17/saints-help-to-church-more-extensive-than-admitted

1 hour ago, viking said:

NFL needs to set a new precedent when it comes to tampering

 

Option A: you get a hefty punishment via a docked draft pick

Option B: you get a lower punishment via pick swaps with the team that you tampered against

31 minutes ago, skywindO2 said:

They should obviously lay down the hammer on Atlanta for this egregious tampering offense. Anything less than 3 first round picks to Minnesota would be a tremendous miscarriage of justice. 

Lumped you 2 together.... Ahhh, vikings fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, General Tso said:

Any Vikings fans that thought they'd switch places with Atlanta at 8 💤

Makes sense. Has me thinking penalty won't be as stiff as people think if it's moving to next year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteelKing728 said:

I haven't cared about that in forever. What Sean Payton did with the Saints though is unforgivable.

Well, they're just a dirty organization from the top down. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, scar988 said:

Makes sense. Has me thinking penalty won't be as stiff as people think if it's moving to next year.

It'll probably be "stiff" but nowhere near as stiff as Vikings' fans were hoping.  Maybe a late Day 3 pick, probably more likely an early Day 3 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, scar988 said:

Makes sense. Has me thinking penalty won't be as stiff as people think if it's moving to next year.

Makes me think they are having difficulty finding proof of either or both actually occurring?

Sorry but you can't tell me if there's proof, the NFL wouldn't of hammered 1 or both clubs before this draft? 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nabbs4u said:

Makes me think they are having difficulty finding proof of either or both actually occurring?

Sorry but you can't tell me if there's proof, the NFL wouldn't of hammered 1 or both clubs before this draft? 🤷‍♂️

Maybe... but since when has the NFL required "proof" to do anything?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...