paul-mac Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 8 hours ago, thebestever6 said: Wonder who's gonna be there Rankins probably wont. Team typically keep 9 OL: 5 starters, 2 swing Tackles and 2 swing Guard/Centers I feel that we may be set on the interior: LG: Leary C: Paradis RG: McGovern Swing G/C 1: Garcia Swing G/C 2: Dielman I’m all over Martinas Rankin if he makes it to our 3rd rounder but I think he probably goes in the 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 4 hours ago, thebestever6 said: I know mant don't want Mayfield but if you look up his qbbase score and compare it to others historically I think he's pretty safe. I’m still waiting for everyone to get on my train Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebestever6 Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 4 minutes ago, Counselor said: I’m still waiting for everyone to get on my train Cho choo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoBruin Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 5 hours ago, jsthomp2007 said: How can anyone suggest that Keenum was average last year? I keep reading this. Granted, I am not pounding on the table for him to be the Broncos long-term solution. But, Keenum had an amazing year last year! Or, was I watching en entirely different game? Also, you know what would help him out...a good running game. You know who is looking more and more likely to fall to the Broncos at #5? Barkley...not Charles, but Saquon. I have no faith in Keenum long term but yeah, it’s a little disingenuous to say he was average. He had a quality season. It’s fine to be skeptical of 2017 and view it as the outlier it is, but in a vaccuum he played good football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroncoBruin Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 4 hours ago, paul-mac said: Team typically keep 9 OL: 5 starters, 2 swing Tackles and 2 swing Guard/Centers I feel that we may be set on the interior: LG: Leary C: Paradis RG: McGovern Swing G/C 1: Garcia Swing G/C 2: Dielman I’m all over Martinas Rankin if he makes it to our 3rd rounder but I think he probably goes in the 2nd. But Garcia is a bad player and should be cut to save 1.9 million. Coming off the bench doesn’t make him any less of a liability if he has to play. To me, being set at iOL or OT means you have one vet player of quality on the bench. This is just a repeat of 2017 with Garcia and McGovern swapping spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 5 hours ago, jsthomp2007 said: How can anyone suggest that Keenum was average last year? I keep reading this. Granted, I am not pounding on the table for him to be the Broncos long-term solution. But, Keenum had an amazing year last year! Or, was I watching en entirely different game? Also, you know what would help him out...a good running game. You know who is looking more and more likely to fall to the Broncos at #5? Barkley...not Charles, but Saquon. Damn I wanted Charles or Matt at #5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 50 minutes ago, BroncoBruin said: But Garcia is a bad player and should be cut to save 1.9 million. Coming off the bench doesn’t make him any less of a liability if he has to play. To me, being set at iOL or OT means you have one vet player of quality on the bench. This is just a repeat of 2017 with Garcia and McGovern swapping spots. Garcia is fine as a backup. I could understand if they don’t want to be spending $2m on a backup but I think the other guy JJ Dielman is a pure C so they probably keep Garcia since he can play LG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebestever6 Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 How is cecil Lamley? He reports we want Saquan Barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKRNA Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 3 hours ago, paul-mac said: Garcia is fine as a backup. I could understand if they don’t want to be spending $2m on a backup but I think the other guy JJ Dielman is a pure C so they probably keep Garcia since he can play LG. I don't even like Garcia as a backup. As the Interior backup, we'd have a significant downgrade in play every time he takes the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaldyBronco Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 Home boys. I love how all the sudden the NFL Network DJ has no QBs in his top 5. Sometimes I feel like I am watching American Idol when the totally transparent drama creating “Top 50s” come out. It’s like the chick winning he bachelor revealed after the 3rd Episode. Check out DJs Top 50 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKRNA Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 31 minutes ago, BaldyBronco said: Home boys. I love how all the sudden the NFL Network DJ has no QBs in his top 5. Sometimes I feel like I am watching American Idol when the totally transparent drama creating “Top 50s” come out. It’s like the chick winning he bachelor revealed after the 3rd Episode. Check out DJs Top 50 2.0 I think he's only had one in the top 10 all year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebestever6 Posted March 24, 2018 Share Posted March 24, 2018 16 minutes ago, AKRNA said: I think he's only had one in the top 10 all year. Every time I see him he rides Josh Allen so it better be him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiehardBronxFan Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 Howdy from NYC Lots of noise around here that the Giants have 1, and only 1, QB that they want. Speculation is that it’s Darnold, and “sources inside the Giants” saying there’s Equal probability they try to trade up to 1 to grab him as trading down. I still strongly believe QB’s go 1,2, 3 - and I wouldn’t be surprised to see somebody trade with the Browns and take one at 4. If they don’t, Browns very likely to take Chubb at 4. All of this is to say: if Elway wants to be sure he gets a QB, I believe he’llneed To trade up. I can’t see him spending the Draft capital to do that, except maybe a “low”cost trade up to 4 to keep somebody else from going there, IF his guy is the 4th QB standing. But I think that’s unlikely. Right now, if I had to bet, I’d say the odds on favorite right now is likely Barkley at 5. But still so many different ways this could go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 3 hours ago, BaldyBronco said: Home boys. I love how all the sudden the NFL Network DJ has no QBs in his top 5. Sometimes I feel like I am watching American Idol when the totally transparent drama creating “Top 50s” come out. It’s like the chick winning he bachelor revealed after the 3rd Episode. Check out DJs Top 50 2.0 To be fair I don’t think many people are saying the QBs are necessarily the most talented players in the draft, just they slot them early in mock drafts because they always get pushed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKRNA Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 2 hours ago, DiehardBronxFan said: Howdy from NYC Lots of noise around here that the Giants have 1, and only 1, QB that they want. Speculation is that it’s Darnold, and “sources inside the Giants” saying there’s Equal probability they try to trade up to 1 to grab him as trading down. I still strongly believe QB’s go 1,2, 3 - and I wouldn’t be surprised to see somebody trade with the Browns and take one at 4. If they don’t, Browns very likely to take Chubb at 4. All of this is to say: if Elway wants to be sure he gets a QB, I believe he’llneed To trade up. I can’t see him spending the Draft capital to do that, except maybe a “low”cost trade up to 4 to keep somebody else from going there, IF his guy is the 4th QB standing. But I think that’s unlikely. Right now, if I had to bet, I’d say the odds on favorite right now is likely Barkley at 5. But still so many different ways this could go. Everybody knows my preference would be Nelson, no secret there. It seems though that the three top rated players this year are Barkley, Nelson and Chubb in no particular order. Also, there's quite a separation between them and the 4th best. All three should be game changers at the next level. Bottom line, as long as we take one of them at 5 or trade down I'll be happy. A reach for a QB at #5 will not please me at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.