Sandy Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 (edited) 9 minutes ago, HokieHigh said: 16 of this is going to rodgers, right? or is he already accounted for He hasn't accounted the $8.69m hit we take for trading him Edit: nor the $870k hit for the replacement player on the roster Edited April 9, 2023 by Sandy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 9, 2023 Author Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 Need to take Blake Martinez off that list. I've been informed many times on this board that he was a bust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 Am I the only one who wouldn't be surprised if the Packers were to sign Randall Cobb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Brat&Beer said: Am I the only one who wouldn't be surprised if the Packers were to sign Randall Cobb? I'd say no chance, but if the Packers come up empty in the draft then maybe they will have to bring him back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said: Am I the only one who wouldn't be surprised if the Packers were to sign Randall Cobb? I've thought that for a while, a veteran who is a good locker room guy and won't make waves because he isn't playing much. Like having another coach in the room. Edited April 9, 2023 by R T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 12 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: I'd say no chance, but if the Packers come up empty in the draft then maybe they will have to bring him back. It's almost a given they're going to bring in a veteran receiver. Why not maybe one who knows the offense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Brat&Beer said: It's almost a given they're going to bring in a veteran receiver. Why not maybe one who knows the offense? I still think Corey Davis might be coming to GB in the Rodgers deal if he's open for a reworked deal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said: It's almost a given they're going to bring in a veteran receiver. Why not maybe one who knows the offense? The why has been answered. The why not would be because Gutes was forced to trade for him and MLF was forced to have him on the team, now they don't want to see his face ever again regardless of how cheap he would be. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted April 10, 2023 Share Posted April 10, 2023 For those that like to freakout about everything, here is a thought to ponder. When the Packers traded Adams to the Raiders it was reported that Gutes chose to take the 1st and 2nd last year rather than a 1st in 2022 and the future 1st in 2023. How good would it be to have the 7th overall pick this year rather than having Christian Watson already in the house. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgwingman Posted April 10, 2023 Share Posted April 10, 2023 4 minutes ago, R T said: For those that like to freakout about everything, here is a thought to ponder. When the Packers traded Adams to the Raiders it was reported that Gutes chose to take the 1st and 2nd last year rather than a 1st in 2022 and the future 1st in 2023. How good would it be to have the 7th overall pick this year rather than having Christian Watson already in the house. That is an interesting point I had not considered. But I think it supports my personal theory that 2022 was Gute's last attempt at an all in season for Rodgers. They wanted every last pick to give it one last run for Number 12, and Gute was willing to trade most of the trade compensation they could have gotten for one last run in 2022. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted April 10, 2023 Share Posted April 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, pgwingman said: That is an interesting point I had not considered. But I think it supports my personal theory that 2022 was Gute's last attempt at an all in season for Rodgers. They wanted every last pick to give it one last run for Number 12, and Gute was willing to trade most of the trade compensation they could have gotten for one last run in 2022. Also assumes no impact from the 2rp that the raiders would have made. Lost to 49ers by 3, steelers by 3, rams by 1, colts by 5, jags by 7, chiefs by 1, titans by 2, cardinals by 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted April 10, 2023 Share Posted April 10, 2023 1 minute ago, pgwingman said: That is an interesting point I had not considered. But I think it supports my personal theory that 2022 was Gute's last attempt at an all in season for Rodgers. They wanted every last pick to give it one last run for Number 12, and Gute was willing to trade most of the trade compensation they could have gotten for one last run in 2022. What Watson ultimately becomes will define the decision, but I agree with you that it was made will the all-in mindset in play and I'm very good with it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted April 10, 2023 Share Posted April 10, 2023 Just now, R T said: What Watson ultimately becomes will define the decision, but I agree with you that it was made will the all-in mindset in play and I'm very good with it. I would take watson (with what we now know about him) over every receiver in this class by a wide margin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted April 10, 2023 Share Posted April 10, 2023 1 minute ago, HokieHigh said: Also assumes no impact from the 2rp that the raiders would have made. Lost to 49ers by 3, steelers by 3, rams by 1, colts by 5, jags by 7, chiefs by 1, titans by 2, cardinals by 6 Using WAR as an argument is a real reach here IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.