Jump to content

SURVIVOR POOL XII is now over! THE DUKE is our champion!

Woz

By Woz
in NFL General

Recommended Posts

Woz

Woz

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 minutes ago, 1BackInBlackFan said:

Pats and Pack squeak by. There would have been so many eliminated if they didn't pull out those wins.

Indeed. This week's stats by pick:

  • Survived week 3
    • Green Bay = 34 (40.0% of remaining field, 24.8% of week 3 picks)
    • New England = 33 (38.8%, 24.1%)
    • Philadelphia = 2 (2.4%, 1.5%)
    • L.A. Rams = 1 (1.2%, 0.7%)
    • NY Jets = 1 (1.2%, 0.7%)
    • Kansas City = 1 (1.2%, 0.7%)
    • Tennessee = 1 (1.2%, 0.7%)
  • Still at risk
    • no pick recorded = 9 (10.6% of remaining field, 6.6% of week 3 picks)
    • Dallas = 3 (3.5%, 2.2%)
  • Eliminated
    • Miami = 15 (28.8% of eliminated field, 10.9% of week 3 picks)
    • Pittsburgh = 15 (28.8%, 10.9%)
    • Denver = 10 (19.2%, 7.3%)
    • Cleveland = 5 (9.6%, 3.6%)
    • Baltimore = 3 (5.8%, 2.2%)
    • Carolina = 2 (3.8%, 1.5%)
    • San Francisco = 1 (1.9%, 0.7%)
    • LA Chargers = 1 (1.9%, 0.7%)

The bolded winners were the only ones who were resting easy this week. Everyone else was biting nails late.
The bolded/italicized losers are the ones who grumbling about their late bad luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shady Slim

Shady Slim

Posted
Posted
Just now, Shady Slim said:

haha yeah the rams, surprised they weren't a more popular pick 

happy to get in to the better half given this is my first go around

i was just about to edit this post to say this but then i remembered

at first i was going to pick the ravens and then miami, it was only like an hour before rams-miners that i decided to flip flop

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shady Slim

Shady Slim

Posted
Posted
Just now, Shady Slim said:

i was just about to edit this post to say this but then i remembered

at first i was going to pick the ravens and then miami, it was only like an hour before rams-miners that i decided to flip flop

and i had the edit tab open for this post to correct a typo but went cancel far out i'm really bad at this

rams-niners****

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woz

Woz

Posted
  • Author
Posted
20 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said:

Was that NE and GB? Those were mine. Shocked they both almost lost

Indeed. My evaluation 

1 indention = violates one of my rules
2 indentions = violates two or more of my rules
* = who I would pick if I had to pick that game
# = who I would pick if I had to pick that game, but couldn't because team was previously selected
[...] = comments, rule violations

        LAR#- SFO   [TNF, Divisional Game, Away Team]
        BAL*- JAC   [Away Team, London Game]
CLE*- IND   [GAMBLE PICK!!]
    NYG - PHI*  [Divisional]
        MIA*- NYJ   [Divisional, Away Team]
    DEN*- BUF   [Away Team]
    NOR - CAR*  [Divisional]
    PIT*- CHI   [Away Team]
    ATL*- DET   [50-50 call]
    TAM*- MIN   [Away Team]
HOU - NWE*  [1]
    SEA*- TEN   [Away Team]
CIN - GRB*  [2]
        KAN*- SDG   [Divisional, Away Team]
        OAK#- WAS   [Washington Game, Away Team, EC->WC/WC->EC (but given start time doesn't matter)]
    DAL - ARI   [50-50 call]

I knew full well I was going to rue that pick, but I thought I could maybe squeak it by. Oh well.

 

19 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said:

Could be under 80 if some guys dont get picks in. That seems low for so early. Any idea if it is Woz? 

If we don't get the rest to sign up and Dallas were to lose (GO CARDINALS!!), we would be down to 73 competitors. From a raw number score, that would be a bit thin. However, we only had 181 sign up in the first place, so that would only be 40.3% of the field. It may be a bit thin, but not beyond the pale. I roughly expect 50% +/- 5% by week 3 to remain. We're a bit ahead of pace, but not that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...