Norm Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, Packerraymond said: King >>> Randall. He'd have been #4. Which probably would've made him a cancer in a contract year. Then trade him for a pile of **** before the deadline if it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Okay. Time to get out of the Panic Room. Night all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Ketchup said: Yes it's early. Yes free agency hasn't started yet. No the draft hasn't happened yet. Yes there is time to get better. None of that changes the piss poor value we just got for Randall. Sugar coat it however you want, we still got crap value for a starting CB that is still on his rookie deal. Well yes. Nobody is debating this We obviously didn't want him on the team and bad value is better than worse value or no value... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: I can tell you if we sign Trumaine Johnson and draft Denzel Ward I'd take that secondary over last year's x1000000. How about a secondary of Trumaine Johnson, Denzel Ward, Kevin King, and Damarious Randall?? Ta Da!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Packers are going to trade up to draft a QB and are trading Rodgers for young defensive talent and more draft picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 People. Cutting your loses is like a real life thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Just now, AlexGreen#20 said: How about a secondary of Trumaine Johnson, Denzel Ward, Kevin King, and Damarious Randall?? Ta Da!!!! Again, Randall as a #4 in a contract year, you think that's an attitude you want? I'd rather bring back House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopackgonerd Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 6 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: How many starting caliber players are you expecting to pull in FA/the Draft? This isn't the time frame to take steps backwards We have a whopping 13 picks to do things in the draft, you could get(if they draft well 1-2 solid corners) and 1-2 in FA. All is not lost yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 lollololol **** that is funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boondoggle Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Draft is deep for CB's this year. Would guess we take one early now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: People. Cutting your loses is like a real life thing. He wasn't a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 There's two ways you come to this decision: You think Randall's attitude was such a cancer you had to get him out of there. You think Rodgers is retiring after the end of next year and want a potential replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 Here ya go.....see if this will help you sleep tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted March 10, 2018 Share Posted March 10, 2018 glutenklop strikes i knew it from the first time i saw his face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.