incognito_man Posted January 15, 2019 Author Share Posted January 15, 2019 Just now, Sasquatch said: All these run-first coaches must mean one thing - we’re grabbing Le’veon Bell. (Borderline green lettering) Williams > Bell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 24 minutes ago, SpeightTheVillain said: This is pure conjecture but given Mac's time under Paul Hackett (who was QB coach under Walsh), and LaFleur coming from the Walsh originated Shanahan tree, could the edge have been given to Nate Hackett over Monken because of the similar verbiage? Basically, Mac, LaFleur, and Hackett all use Walsh verbiage, and they wanted some continuity in the language of the offense. Although, probably over half the league uses Walsh verbiage and I have no idea if Monken does or not. Very good points. I can certainly believe that may have played a large part in hiring Hackett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 17 minutes ago, BrettFavre004 said: His QB's will have been heading into the season, EJ Manuel, Kyle Orton, Blake Bortles, Aaron Rodgers One of these things is not like the other. Racist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: Williams > Bell Or that too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox_NFLs_GG Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, cannondale said: Racist Yeah I think he was referring to Rodgers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacman5252 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 I’m okay with the hire. Due to the nature of the opening not involving playcalling, we were going to either get a retread or a qb coach on his first OC job. I’ll give him a little benefit of the doubt as he worked for the grease fire organizations of the nfl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Just now, Fox_NFLs_GG said: Yeah I think he was referring to Rodgers... Thanks. I would have never guessed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacman5252 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Hackett is proof that you should not take title step up jobs at any company Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 At least I am comforted in the knowledge that if he was a bad candiate Pettine would've gotten into LaFleur's ear warning him off him. Since we hired him I have to assume he didn't and that he would be a good addition to our coaching staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, pacman5252 said: I’m okay with the hire. Due to the nature of the opening not involving playcalling, we were going to either get a retread or a qb coach on his first OC job. I’ll give him a little benefit of the doubt as he worked for the grease fire organizations of the nfl. Honestly, the bolded above gives me a little bit of heartburn. I’m reassured, however, that just because someone coached in a winning program, doesn’t mean they’ll be successful elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said: Why are his nipples so hard? https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/6adc4701-0e9e-4620-906a-aaa22f0f8c89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 hours ago, ThatJerkDave said: Expected golddust lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, incognito_man said: McDaniels/Monken After watching NE Sunday, I'm relieved they didn't go McDaniels. Rodgers is going to want to push the ball down the field and McDaniels doesn't seem like a guy to alter his scheme in a co-op system. LaFleur was the guy for Rodgers IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Norm said: Expected golddust lol I already used golddust today, so it was hard gay's turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacman5252 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: Honestly, the bolded above gives me a little bit of heartburn. I’m reassured, however, that just because someone coached in a winning program, doesn’t mean they’ll be successful elsewhere. It gives me more hope honestly. With Bortles and Manuel, you just arent going to be successful. We saw MM go from a bad SF to here and have success after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.