Leader Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Schefter: Big day for Kyler Murray and the other QBs here at the combine. QB measurement today. Murray expected to measure somewhere between 5-9.5 and 5-10 (I've heard others say he's closer to 5'8, which if true, will give him a "Barry Sanders-like" ability to disappear behind the OL) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 9 hours ago, Arthur Penske said: Same here. I think 2006 for me. Dif usernames for both of us I guess. 2005, newbs. Officially will have been on FF for 1/2 my life sometime in March. Joined as a 14 year old lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Damn....Hollywood coming in at a cool 166 lbs.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Great news on Murray's height. Could easily propel him into the top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 7 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Damn....Hollywood coming in at a cool 166 lbs.... Lol, that's tiny. Kind of reminds me of Desean's Jackson's weigh in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redt Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Wouldn't hate Holywood at #44, Thinking OT at #12, Edge/DL at #30, and BPA at #44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hands Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 4 hours ago, Leader said: Schefter: Big day for Kyler Murray and the other QBs here at the combine. QB measurement today. Murray expected to measure somewhere between 5-9.5 and 5-10 (I've heard others say he's closer to 5'8, which if true, will give him a "Barry Sanders-like" ability to disappear behind the OL) Shocked that Murray came in at 5-10. Thought he was smaller. Know he's fast, can he read defenses will be the big question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubz41 Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 39 minutes ago, Redt said: Wouldn't hate Holywood at #44, Thinking OT at #12, Edge/DL at #30, and BPA at #44 I'm sorry but that would be a huge mistake. He is not that dynamic. He is LITTLE. There haven't even been a handful of success stories for guys under 5'10" AND under 170 lbs. I just feel that if we take a WR that early, Deebo Samuel has much better chance of success in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 1 hour ago, packfanfb said: Great news on Murray's height. Could easily propel him into the top 10. + bigger hands than Goff. This is a W for GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redt Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Love Deebo as well, IDK Brown looked pretty dynamic on the field this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Are there any players you could see GB shopping at the combine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 12 hours ago, Arthur Penske said: 14 hours ago, rcon14 said: oh yeah, I'm an OG from the Mosqueda/Waldo era. 2007 or so I think is when I joined. Same here. I think 2006 for me. Dif usernames for both of us I guess. what were your usernames? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Fl0nkerton said: Are there any players you could see GB shopping at the combine? sadly no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Hmm...Fant is 250, I wonder if that's legit. If it is, I kind of like him more than Hockenson. Fant had a rep as being slight since he was 220 as a freshthing, so there was concern he'd be in the 230s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 48 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: Hmm...Fant is 250, I wonder if that's legit. If it is, I kind of like him more than Hockenson. Fant had a rep as being slight since he was 220 as a freshthing, so there was concern he'd be in the 230s. They are both soooo very good. I"m like you, though, I kind of like Fant more. Probably because he's got more "vertical" in his game, so his film pops a little more to me. At 250, he can be taught how to block well enough. While I think there will be some very good DL and OT on the board at #30, that's where I start to get interested in those TE's. I really dig Fant. I can see where Hock can probably come in right away and be a plus blocker with some great receiving skills. Going to be fun to see where all these TE's end up. I like the class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.