Jump to content

Top 10 Linebackers


Guest

Recommended Posts

On 7/10/2019 at 7:26 PM, Dolmonite26 said:

I think I'd drop Kendricks for Greenway, and I'm iffy on Barr being on this list at all, but as you stated there isn't a great history of talent here...so maybe by default he sneaks in

Kendricks is higher on my list than Barr.  I agree with you on Greenway, so I'd put him on in place of Barr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Uncle Buck said:

Kendricks is higher on my list than Barr.  I agree with you on Greenway, so I'd put him on in place of Barr.

No way is Kendricks ahead of Barr. Barr is the engine that drives this defense.

Kendricks is on par with a guy like Ben Leber. 

Edited by SemperFeist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of Greenway being on this list is a surprise, guy could play and was one of the best ever for the Vikings at linebacker in my book.  Ed McDaniel was on some poor defenses but he was a decent backer and at the time was one of the few bright spots at a weak position for the team.  

 

Most of the older guys I cannot speak to because I never watched them play.  Been watching football consistently since 1998 but not much before that outside of short clips.  Impressive list though for sure. Hard to do though because tackling stats for the team all time are hard to get.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2019 at 8:18 PM, SemperFeist said:

No way is Kendricks ahead of Barr. Barr is the engine that drives this defense.

Kendricks is on par with a guy like Ben Leber. 

Maybe it's just the positions they play, but it seems like Kendricks is in on a lot more plays than Barr ever is.  Not only that, but we saw last year how Barr can be exploited when you leave him alone.  Kendricks may not be a ton better in that area, but he sure seems better from what I've seen.  Personally, I would have let Barr go in the offseason and used the money to strengthen another area on the team - maybe with O-line or another good running back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Uncle Buck said:

We saw them do that to Barr last year.  He got embarrassed out there.

The first quarter of the season yeah, but that was mainly against slot WRs. No OLB should be asked to consistently do that.

 

Barr’s coverage numbers were better than Kendricks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Duluther said:

The first quarter of the season yeah, but that was mainly against slot WRs. No OLB should be asked to consistently do that.

 

Barr’s coverage numbers were better than Kendricks.

I agree, Kendricks in coverage has a lot to work on and gets beat consistently.  Sure is in coverage more as the ILB usually than Barr but still, Kendricks lack of length and ball awareness hurts him in coverage but few linebackers are great in coverage anyways.   I assume Barr plays more DE or rush OLB with the aging pass rushers the Vikings have, or I hope he is on the edge more and can do some damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would definitely have Blair over Studwell.  I love Studwell, but Blair, as far as I'm concerned, was a far more impactful LB.  I would personally also have Greenway and Eddie McDaniel on the list, definitely over EJ Henderson (who I think has been overrated by many) and Kendricks.  They could both be included on an honorable mention basis, along with Jack Del Rio (who, while he didn't make his name in MN, was very good in his time here).  Can we include Chris Doleman too, considering he started out as a LB and had 2 of his 8 career INTs as one?  xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Blair was, far and away, the best overall Linebacker to play for The Vikings.  He was also one of the very best athletes to play for them.  He was their only linebacker who should have been considered for The NFL Hall of Fame.  Studwell, at his peak, was nowhere near Blair at his peak.  I remember thinking about how great na "steal" Blair was to be gotten in the 2nd Round.  Hilgenberg, Winston, and Warwick were certainly good players, but they also benefitted tremendously, from being products of an excellent defensive system.  They weren't close to having the athletic abilities of Blair, Siemon, McNeil, Barr,  Kendricks, and Henderson.

 

I'd put Blair first by a mile, then Siemon, then McNiel for play at their peaks, and replace McNiel with Studwell for overall career.  But, it's a reflection of how good The Vikings' defensive line usually was, and how much they always had to pay those players to keep them happy, and keep them as Vikings, that the team usually didn't have enough cap room left over to pay excellent-lever linebackers, even if they had the draft choices to draft them.  It's also true that The Vikings' almost always valuing their DL more than linebacking, often used their top draft choices for DL, and almost never for linebackers.

Edited by Robb_K
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...