Jump to content

ESPN Pass Block Win Rate and QBs Who Avoid Sacks


RandyMossIsBoss

Recommended Posts

Since last year ESPN has been showing us a bit of their new metric of pass rush and pass block win rate. Here's some of the team/player leaders through 4 weeks. At the moment our only access to these stats are through occasional articles, the metric is not in any public database. Hopefully that changes. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/27584726/nfl-pass-blocking-pass-rushing-rankings-2019-pbwr-prwr-leaderboard

 

Quote

OK, what is this exactly?
Our new Pass Block Win Rate metric tells us the rate at which linemen can sustain their blocks for 2.5 seconds or longer. Likewise, our Pass Rush Win Rate metric tells us how often a pass-rusher is able to beat his block within 2.5 seconds. Our model of pass blocking harnesses player tracking data from NFL Next Gen Stats.

 

Not an exact science, but comparing actual sack rate to pass block win rate may indicate which QBs do a better job at evading sacks?

Rank Team PBWR Rank Sack Rate QBSR
1 Cowboys 65.6% 3 2.4% 6.9%
2 Bills 65.3% 17 6.8% 19.6%
3 Chargers 64.5% 21 7.5% 21.1%
4 Packers 64.1% 11 5.5% 15.3%
5 Browns 63.6% 24 8.6% 23.5%
6 Raiders 63.2% 15 6.2% 16.9%
7 Colts 63.1% 6 4.3% 11.8%
8 Texans 60.6% 31 14.2% 36.0%
9 Bears 60.2% 16 6.6% 16.6%
10 Ravens 60.2% 18 7.1% 17.9%
11 Chiefs 59.8% 1 1.9% 4.8%
12 Jets 59.7% 30 13.8% 34.3%
13 Titans 59.5% 32 14.3% 35.3%
14 Steelers 59.3% 5 2.9% 7.1%
15 Saints 59.2% 14 5.9% 14.5%
16 Eagles 58.4% 9 4.7% 11.2%
17 Jaguars 57.9% 22 7.8% 18.4%
18 Buccaneers 57.3% 25 8.6% 20.2%
19 49ers 56.6% 2 2.4% 5.4%
20 Cardinals 55.7% 28 11.8% 26.7%
21 Giants 55.4% 7 4.4% 9.8%
22 Redskins 52.8% 13 5.9% 12.5%
23 Patriots 52.7% 4 2.7% 5.7%
24 Falcons 51.4% 12 5.7% 11.7%
25 Seahawks 51.1% 26 9.0% 18.5%
26 Lions 48.1% 10 5.0% 9.6%
27 Vikings 47.6% 23 8.1% 15.4%
28 Rams 46.8% 8 4.6% 8.7%
29 Bengals 46.6% 27 11.4% 21.4%
30 Dolphins 41.1% 29 13.2% 22.5%
31 Panthers 40.0% 19 7.4% 12.3%
32 Broncos 36.5% 20 7.4% 11.7%

 

How to read final column, QB sack rate: Tom Brady was sacked on only 5.7% of the 47.3% of drop backs his pass protection failed (good). Deshaun Watson was sacked on 36% of the 39.4% of drop backs his pass protection failed (not good).

(So if Brady dropped back 100 times,  his OL failed in pass pro 47.3 times but he was only sacked 5.7 times)

 

A bit of an overly simplistic view, just because a QB was sacked when his OL held up for 3 seconds doesn't mean it's his fault, and just because they held up for less than 2 seconds doesn't mean it's NOT their fault, but it is likely a solid indicator.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested in seeing some sort of analytics between this and offensive schemes. I assume some of these guys benefit from shorter throws/WCO offense or having a good RB/TE safety blanket. 

Conversely those that are being taught stand in the pocket and throw 9 routes all day might be hurt by their OC. 

Additionally you would think veterans would be better simply due to being able to read a defense quicker

Edited by Matts4313
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ordered it around to sort by QBSR. Top three is pretty close with Pat Mahomes, Jimmy G, Tom Brady followed by Dak and Ben Rudolph and then another drop to the rest. The bottom three sticks out quite bad as well.  

Rank Team PBWR Rank Sack Rate QBSR
11 Chiefs 59.8% 1 1.9% 4.8%
19 49ers 56.6% 2 2.4% 5.4%
23 Patriots 52.7% 4 2.7% 5.7%
1 Cowboys 65.6% 3 2.4% 6.9%
14 Steelers 59.3% 5 2.9% 7.1%
28 Rams 46.8% 8 4.6% 8.7%
26 Lions 48.1% 10 5,00% 9.6%
21 Giants 55.4% 7 4.4% 9.8%
16 Eagles 58.4% 9 4.7% 11.2%
24 Falcons 51.4% 12 5.7% 11.7%
32 Broncos 36.5% 20 7.4% 11.7%
7 Colts 63.1% 6 4.3% 11.8%
31 Panthers 40,00% 19 7.4% 12.3%
22 Redskins 52.8% 13 5.9% 12.5%
15 Saints 59.2% 14 5.9% 14.5%
4 Packers 64.1% 11 5.5% 15.3%
27 Vikings 47.6% 23 8.1% 15.4%
9 Bears 60.2% 16 6.6% 16.6%
6 Raiders 63.2% 15 6.2% 16.9%
10 Ravens 60.2% 18 7.1% 17.9%
17 Jaguars 57.9% 22 7.8% 18.4%
25 Seahawks 51.1% 26 9,00% 18.5%
2 Bills 65.3% 17 6.8% 19.6%
18 Buccaneers 57.3% 25 8.6% 20.2%
3 Chargers 64.5% 21 7.5% 21.1%
29 Bengals 46.6% 27 11.4% 21.4%
30 Dolphins 41.1% 29 13.2% 22.5%
5 Browns 63.6% 24 8.6% 23.5%
20 Cardinals 55.7% 28 11.8% 26.7%
12 Jets 59.7% 30 13.8% 34.3%
13 Titans 59.5% 32 14.3% 35.3%
8 Texans 60.6% 31 14.2% 36.0%
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, evilflamingo said:

The bottom three sticks out quite bad as well.

Yeah; Texans OL is top 10 in PBWR, but the team still comes up dead last. 

It's known that Watson holds onto the ball too long, but damn. This is really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, CP3MVP said:

 BOB stinks but watson is a very flawed QB. 

I wouldn't go as far as saying flawed. I feel like Deshaun is bound within BoBs parameters which is not conducive to his style of play. Year 1 was true Deshaun Watson. Now we're getting the condensed O'Brien version which is erratic at times. His skillset is complete though, how he puts it together is completely on the coaching staff. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jaytrajik said:

I wouldn't go as far as saying flawed. I feel like Deshaun is bound within BoBs parameters which is not conducive to his style of play. Year 1 was true Deshaun Watson. Now we're getting the condensed O'Brien version which is erratic at times. His skillset is complete though, how he puts it together is completely on the coaching staff. 

“True” DW who had like highest interception percentage  in the league(3.9 %) that year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said:

Mahomes getting it out quicker than anyone coupled with the 'throwing to the most open receivers' theory - if that is true, just how efin' good are those weapons? They are open as soon as Mahomes is ready to throw, if so. 

Its the scheme. That scheme is amazing and its crazy others arent replicating it. Alot of presnap motions, misdirections and just very decieving route concepts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hunter2_1 said:

Mahomes getting it out quicker than anyone coupled with the 'throwing to the most open receivers' theory - if that is true, just how efin' good are those weapons? They are open as soon as Mahomes is ready to throw, if so. 

He doesnt get it out that quick.

Hes just got great pocket maneuverability. Why hes around the best in the league against the blitz. Gets enough time for his WRs to win on long developing routes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jaytrajik said:
10 hours ago, CP3MVP said:

BOB stinks but watson is a very flawed QB. 

I wouldn't go as far as saying flawed. I feel like Deshaun is bound within BoBs parameters which is not conducive to his style of play. Year 1 was true Deshaun Watson. Now we're getting the condensed O'Brien version which is erratic at times. His skillset is complete though, how he puts it together is completely on the coaching staff. 

I would agree with this - Watson in that old Kubiak system (in essence, kind of what Kyle Shanahan is doing) would look tremendous. 

O'Brien's system is very much a thinking persons system, which is why guys such as Brady and (oddly enough) Ryan Fitzpatrick thrive in. It's predicated on pre snap reads, recognizing where the holes are before the ball is snapped and adjusting to those holes. Watson is good in it, but not living up to his potential.

Now, that Kubiak/Shanny system? It creates the lanes by using playfakes, rolling out of the pocket, and attacking the defense underneath with deep in routes and TEs outside the numbers. A guy like Watson in that system could be efficient as well as able to take games over when needed - he's got the arm talent and the athleticism to make those rollouts and mid field strikes routinely.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...