Jump to content

ANALYTICS CANT COME FIRST


HH650

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said:

Our oline was better under the nerds than dorsey imo.

 

Dorsey traded zeitler, didnt replace joe t effectively. 

 

They got jc tretter who was better than anyone acquired by dorsey. 

Yep it was way better and analytics has to come first. All it is is advanced information. You need that before you make any decisions 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NudeTayne said:

The term, "analytics" is being used like "The Russians".

This guy's dialed in to the truiest of the true trues ...

... like other weaponized words ... each a latch-on term to conveniently explain/externalize issues/evils people see in their worlds even though there's no understanding of what the term(s) actually represents or how it is misused to distort the reality of things ...

Edited by Mind Character
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes a complete package.  Not just analytics.  If it were only analytics then our team can leave the combine with that data along with advanced stats from games and plot out the entire draft board without looking at a single video clip.

of course there is a place for analytics, but it is not the be all end all.

there are so many variables that it’s impossible to use only analytics.  The strength of the competition in college.  The value of the team mates around him in college.  Then the athletic measurable.  The actual statistics.  It’s really mind boggling.

Example that everyone should be able to relate to.  The nfl’s leading rusher emmitt smith.  Is he the GOAT?  Let’s compare him to Barry Sanders.  
 

emitt has an elite QB and WR on the same offense as well as a very good oline for most of his career.

Sanders played with journeyman QBs, so so wide receivers, and a sieve for an oline.

my assessment is Sanders was the better player.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DizzyDean said:

It takes a complete package.  Not just analytics.  If it were only analytics then our team can leave the combine with that data along with advanced stats from games and plot out the entire draft board without looking at a single video clip.

of course there is a place for analytics, but it is not the be all end all.

there are so many variables that it’s impossible to use only analytics.  The strength of the competition in college.  The value of the team mates around him in college.  Then the athletic measurable.  The actual statistics.  It’s really mind boggling.

Example that everyone should be able to relate to.  The nfl’s leading rusher emmitt smith.  Is he the GOAT?  Let’s compare him to Barry Sanders.  
 

emitt has an elite QB and WR on the same offense as well as a very good oline for most of his career.

Sanders played with journeyman QBs, so so wide receivers, and a sieve for an oline.

my assessment is Sanders was the better player.

Analytics, done right, is the complete package, it doesnt deny scouting or psychology 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...