Glen Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: Better efficient numbers with less ints? Idk. Woods was Goffs #1.. Goff 394/626, 62 cmp %, 4638 yards, 22 tds, 16 ints, 86.5 rating.. With Woods as Goffs #1 Also 10 fumbles too, if that matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 1 minute ago, Glen said: Goff 394/626, 62 cmp %, 4638 yards, 22 tds, 16 ints, 86.5 rating.. With Woods as Goffs #1 Also 10 fumbles too, if that matters. My guy. He also had a ish online and no run game. I have a run game and a good oline. Wentz was better than Goff last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 10 minutes ago, Glen said: Robert woods isn’t a WR 1 and your run chance is almost 60% what do you expect? Theoretically, I would presume high run % would yield better QB efficiency but lower gross numbers - assuming the running game was effective I do agree his receiving group is below average though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 1 minute ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: My guy. He also had a ish online and no run game. I have a run game and a good oline. Wentz was better than Goff last year. Goff had no run game with Gurley. I have a run game with Gurley. All five of your linemen had an offense who under performed. I have a good OLine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 Just now, Glen said: Goff had no run game with Gurley. I have a run game with Gurley. All five of your linemen had an offense who under performed. I have a good OLine Thank you mother teresa. You’re so wonderful, and full of Ish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Tk3 said: Theoretically, I would presume high run % would yield better QB efficiency but lower gross numbers - assuming the running game was effective I do agree his receiving group is below average though How do you figure? If Carson is programmed to throw at a 1.2 int % rate, the volume would not impact the efficiency. Just effect the gross numbers depending on volume. Now if tammy had a dominant run game his int % would lower based off of coaching strategy & sliders(if owners adjusted them(which most don’t)). Edited April 9, 2020 by Glen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 1 minute ago, Glen said: How do you figure? If Carson is programmed to throw at a 1.2 int % rate, the volume would not impact the efficiency. Just affect the gross numbers depending on volume. Now if tammy had a dominant run game his int % would lower based off of coaching strategy & sliders(if owners adjusted them(which most don’t)). Your math is off and you’re terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 6 minutes ago, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said: Thank you mother teresa. You’re so wonderful, and full of Ish. I’d just like you to address the fact that Goff had a bad run game with Gurley. Yet you have a good run game with Gurley. Doesnt make much sense. Unless you forgot the rams had Gurley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuskieTitan Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 GG @waffles7. Rough first half for my team. Defense is a greater liability than I anticipated. Robbie Gould had struggles too, blocked FG and missed FG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 3 minutes ago, RuskieTitan said: GG @waffles7. Rough first half for my team. Defense is a greater liability than I anticipated. Robbie Gould had struggles too, blocked FG and missed FG. Kisses Ruskin. Missed you bro. Hope the fam is ok. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 1 hour ago, ravens5520 said: Wow was that RNG 🗑 today. It wouldn’t allow us to seal that W and handed Brady the damn game. We get two turnovers in their territory, to only have us fumble and throw a pick right back. Talk about favoring a team. Sickening No shot that should’ve been a loss when we handled them in every category I mean to be fair you moved the ball well because I have a super aggressive defense... give up yards to get turnovers. Was up 14-0 quick, your lucky it didn’t turn into a blowout. The 🐐 does 🐐 things 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 Breaking news. My team sucks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swoosh Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 1 hour ago, Scalamania said: gg @swoosh gg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravens5520 Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 1 hour ago, MookieMonstah said: I mean to be fair you moved the ball well because I have a super aggressive defense... give up yards to get turnovers. Was up 14-0 quick, your lucky it didn’t turn into a blowout. The 🐐 does 🐐 things It was a good game. Definitely just had me heated after seeing that ending. Good battle as always! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted April 9, 2020 Share Posted April 9, 2020 gg @bucsfan333 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.