GW21 Posted March 28, 2022 Share Posted March 28, 2022 7 minutes ago, Chrissooner49er said: Oh. The problem is Mike Wallace was better and taken much later! I think it was that off-season that he was a FA and a bunch of people wanted to sign him and the thought some of us had was that Jenkins could be a cheaper version of that. Obviously that was wrong outside of the cheaper on our cap number part. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 28, 2022 Author Share Posted March 28, 2022 61. San Francisco 49ers Travis Jones IDL, UConn 93. San Francisco 49ers Troy Andersen LB, Montana State 105. San Francisco 49ers Myjai Sanders EDGE, Cincinnati 134. San Francisco 49ers Jelani Woods TE, Virginia 172. San Francisco 49ers Justyn Ross WR, Clemson 187. San Francisco 49ers Cam Jurgens IOL, Nebraska 220. San Francisco 49ers Jalyn Armour-Davis CB, Alabama 221. San Francisco 49ers Tyler Goodson RB, Iowa Meh 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_locniners Posted March 28, 2022 Share Posted March 28, 2022 15 minutes ago, Forge said: 61. San Francisco 49ers Travis Jones IDL, UConn 93. San Francisco 49ers Troy Andersen LB, Montana State 105. San Francisco 49ers Myjai Sanders EDGE, Cincinnati 134. San Francisco 49ers Jelani Woods TE, Virginia 172. San Francisco 49ers Justyn Ross WR, Clemson 187. San Francisco 49ers Cam Jurgens IOL, Nebraska 220. San Francisco 49ers Jalyn Armour-Davis CB, Alabama 221. San Francisco 49ers Tyler Goodson RB, Iowa Meh I would be pretty frustrated if we addressed the IDL and LB with our first two picks. I do like the M.Sanders, Woods, Ross and Jurgens picks……I don’t think they last into the Rounds that are projected here. Could be worse I guess 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 28, 2022 Author Share Posted March 28, 2022 13 minutes ago, P_locniners said: I would be pretty frustrated if we addressed the IDL and LB with our first two picks. I do like the M.Sanders, Woods, Ross and Jurgens picks……I don’t think they last into the Rounds that are projected here. Could be worse I guess If Jones is there at 61, I'm taking him ever time. Top 32 player in this draft for me and he's an easy fill in for DJ Jones right off. It's just a value thing for me I actually only picked Andersen because of the report that we met with him 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burlow Posted March 28, 2022 Share Posted March 28, 2022 42 minutes ago, Forge said: If Jones is there at 61, I'm taking him ever time. Top 32 player in this draft for me and he's an easy fill in for DJ Jones right off. It's just a value thing for me I actually only picked Andersen because of the report that we met with him 😂 I am an ignorant little weasel when it comes to prospects this year, having said that our team gets a large portion of its strength through our defensive line. This strength allows us to be thrifty in other parts of our defense, not sexy but affective. As long as we address O-line with 2-3 picks on our draft I am fine with grabbing a falling talent in place of O-line. As stated previous I am not versed in the talent this year but I have no problem feeding the d line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 28, 2022 Author Share Posted March 28, 2022 1 minute ago, burlow said: I am an ignorant little weasel when it comes to prospects this year, having said that our team gets a large portion of its strength through our defensive line. This strength allows us to be thrifty in other parts of our defense, not sexy but affective. As long as we address O-line with 2-3 picks on our draft I am fine with grabbing a falling talent in place of O-line. As stated previous I am not versed in the talent this year but I have no problem feeding the d line. Offensive line gets ugly quick depending on what site you are using for your mock. I'm doing a PFF one now and offensive line could be used on our second pick because the options are "good enough" but I also don't love the options, tbh. That's almost always where I get turned around ....I want to pick offensive line, don't love the players, so i just end up going elsewhere lol. Kellen Diesch and Zach Tom are fine prospects...but they are also wholly uninspiring, tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GW21 Posted March 28, 2022 Share Posted March 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, Forge said: Offensive line gets ugly quick depending on what site you are using for your mock. I'm doing a PFF one now and offensive line could be used on our second pick because the options are "good enough" but I also don't love the options, tbh. That's almost always where I get turned around ....I want to pick offensive line, don't love the players, so i just end up going elsewhere lol. Kellen Diesch and Zach Tom are fine prospects...but they are also wholly uninspiring, tbh. It really is crazy how much the board differs from PFN, TDN, & PFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 28, 2022 Author Share Posted March 28, 2022 1 minute ago, GW21 said: It really is crazy how much the board differs from PFN, TDN, & PFF. I haven't done a PFN one yet. I do like to do them all just to get some different results lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 29, 2022 Author Share Posted March 29, 2022 Linderbaum falling like a rock in some people's rankings and mocks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GW21 Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 37 minutes ago, Forge said: Linderbaum falling like a rock in some people's rankings and mocks Hopefully he keeps falling! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissooner49er Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 15 hours ago, Forge said: Linderbaum falling like a rock in some people's rankings and mocks Por que, mi amigo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 30, 2022 Author Share Posted March 30, 2022 5 minutes ago, Chrissooner49er said: Por que, mi amigo? Think because of position and scheme fit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrissooner49er Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 4 minutes ago, Forge said: Think because of position and scheme fit Meaning he may fit in our scheme but not theirs? That's fine by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 30, 2022 Author Share Posted March 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, Chrissooner49er said: Meaning he may fit in our scheme but not theirs? That's fine by me. Yeah, he's almost a lock to be in need of a zbs scheme. Someone else mentioned it earlier, but he's got short arms and there are plenty of teams that's have threshold requirements that will at least push him down the board for some Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NcFinest9erFan Posted March 30, 2022 Share Posted March 30, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts