Jump to content

Positional Needs Heading into the Offseason


MKnight82

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, lavar703 said:

My guess is they sign Coop. They went after him hard before he re-signed in Dallas and I can’t imagine Rivera doesn’t still like him. I’d be shocked if he doesn’t end up here. 

He might jump at the chance to Play the Cowgirls twice each year .

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RSkinGM said:

He might jump at the chance to Play the Cowgirls twice each year .

Yep, DJax did & I will go to my grave saying that Brice Allen screwed up by not re-signing DJax when he became a FA in 2017.

How could any front office person watch our passing game in 2016 when Kirk threw for nearly 5000 yards & not bring back either of his starting WRs? 
 

What a total mismanagement of a roster by Bruce that off-season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ARTMONK HOF said:

 

The Seachickens aren’t trading Russ, most rational people have been calling this all off-season. It was a also a pipe dream as is trading for Carr or Rodgers. The only hope for getting an immediate franchise guy this off-season is trading for Watson whenever his legal troubles are settled which I have to believe is coming soon. It’s been 9 months and nothing has been resolved which is ridiculous to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, lavar703 said:

My guess is they sign Coop. They went after him hard before he re-signed in Dallas and I can’t imagine Rivera doesn’t still like him. I’d be shocked if he doesn’t end up here. 

My hope is that they extend Terry & sign Coop when he becomes a FA. I don’t think Coop will be as expensive as he was in 2020. They can cut Collins to clear room to sign Coop and it would basically be an even swap in a cap hit I think as far as next years cap charge,  Then, anything they get out of Samuel as their slot WR is gravy. Hopefully Samuel gets and stays healthy & would have a good year in the slot w/ Coop & Terry on the outside but that all remains to be seen.

Edited by turtle28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ARTMONK HOF said:

Mitchell Trubisky Rumors: Steelers, Commanders, Giants, Panthers, Broncos Linked

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler reported Sunday the interested teams include the Carolina Panthers, Denver Broncos, New York Giants, Pittsburgh Steelers and Washington Commanders.

 

Yeah… so if I’m a QB I wouldn’t come here over any of those teams except the Giants bc you have to compete w/ Daniel Jokes to start & Carolina. its Wild to think that we can’t even do as well as Trubisky at QB in free agency bc of how QBs view our offensive weapons except for Terry & offensive coordinator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MikeT14 said:

Why would the Texans want McCaffery?

Yeah, I don’t see that happening. He’s been injured and is owed a ton of money. Possibly Brian Burns and multiple firsts I could see but how anyone could give up a ton of capital for Watson is beyond me? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, lavar703 said:

Yeah, I don’t see that happening. He’s been injured and is owed a ton of money. Possibly Brian Burns and multiple firsts I could see but how anyone could give up a ton of capital for Watson is beyond me? 

Burns makes more sense absolutely. If I am the Texans though, just gimme all your picks. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...