Norm Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 7 minutes ago, Leader said: Hmmmm.....cant decide whether to look at the clock of the calendar I'm drunk so this doesn't count 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 how bad yall want this. i need this **** so much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReadyToThump Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 This tweet is for my dawg @Norm 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 8 minutes ago, Norm said: how bad yall want this. i need this **** so much Pretty freaking bad, Norm. I saw this on social media today and I took pause for a second. “This could be the final week in a 25 year stretch where GB has almost always been relevant if it all comes crashing down on Saturday.” GB has been relevant for much of my life - I don’t want to live life like a Lion’s fan, lol. Of course a loss doesn’t guarantee irrelevancy, but without Rodgers, and a rebuild looming, it’s a possibility I guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: Pretty freaking bad, Norm. I saw this on social media today and I took pause for a second. “This could be the final week in a 25 year stretch where GB has almost always been relevant if it all comes crashing down on Saturday.” GB has been relevant for much of my life - I don’t want to live life like a Lion’s fan, lol. Of course a loss doesn’t guarantee irrelevancy, but without Rodgers, and a rebuild looming, it’s a possibility I guess. let's win this **** for @Norm's mom's husband. Damn near died this year. LETS GO The biggest GB fan ever. Cried his *** off in the hospital when i brought him that stock with his name on it. It's all too perfect Edited January 19, 2022 by Norm 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 Just now, Norm said: let's win this **** for @Norm's mom's husband. Damn near died this year. LETS GO Gotta say brother, that’s as good a reason as any I’ve heard for GB to take it down! LETS GO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refugee Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 43 minutes ago, Norm said: how bad yall want this. i need this **** so much Ronnie Lott’s pinky bad. Really don’t know what the next chapter will be but man I just want to see this team go full throttle for three games straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pojo Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 SF is not a good matchup for us but it was never going to be easy. Let’s exercise some demons on the first stop on our road to the championship like the Bucks did vs the Heat! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lodestar Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 32 minutes ago, Norm said: let's win this **** for @Norm's mom's husband. Damn near died this year. LETS GO The biggest GB fan ever. Cried his *** off in the hospital when i brought him that stock with his name on it. It's all too perfect Goddammit thought this was another Deguara's dad reference 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spilltray Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 4 hours ago, persiandud said: that is categorically false. the biggest mismatch is our rush D against their rush O. and concerningly, DVOA actually has the Niners as the better team overall. Team DVOA: SF 6th, GB 9th Offense DVOA: SF 5th, GB 2nd. Pass O: SF 5th, GB 2nd. Rush O: SF 5th, GB 8th Defense DVOA: SF 7th, GB 22nd. Pass D : SF 16th, GB 15th. Rush D : SF 2nd, GB 28th at least we're both ****ty on special teams. SF 26th, GB 32nd lol Our rush d isn't that bad regardless of the numbers. The bulk of it is running QB, usually after they are down quite a bit. What was the stat? 1 RB had a 100y + game vs GB this year? Stats are fine but not at all a reliable indicator. The run D isn't some black hole like those numbers would suggest. They've contained opponents RB all season. Quite frankly I'm fine with letting the QB run a bit. They aren't throwing and will take some shots. That's a win for me. I watch enough NFL to know the Packers run D is not really bottom tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 1 hour ago, Norm said: how bad yall want this. i need this **** so much Same. Same..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 2 hours ago, Norm said: Ill never ever talk **** about this dude again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEagle Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 3 hours ago, incognito_man said: We were leading for 610 plays, 195 of those our opponent ran (32%). We were tied for 230 plays, 103 of those our opponent ran (45%). We were trailing for 197 plays, 97 of those our opponent ran (49%). I must have misread that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAM Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 1 hour ago, **** said: SF is not a good matchup for us but it was never going to be easy. Let’s exercise some demons on the first stop on our road to the championship like the Bucks did vs the Heat! There are no easy matches at this point in the playoffs. FYI Excorcise demons, if you start exercising them they keep coming back for workouts. At least that's what Norm told me 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEagle Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 55 minutes ago, spilltray said: Our rush d isn't that bad regardless of the numbers. The bulk of it is running QB, usually after they are down quite a bit. What was the stat? 1 RB had a 100y + game vs GB this year? Stats are fine but not at all a reliable indicator. The run D isn't some black hole like those numbers would suggest. They've contained opponents RB all season. Quite frankly I'm fine with letting the QB run a bit. They aren't throwing and will take some shots. That's a win for me. I watch enough NFL to know the Packers run D is not really bottom tier. I tend to agree. We tend to tilt towards defending the pass. The rush defense hasn't been that bad--although we haven't faced a murderer's row of RBs. Kamara 20 for 83 Swift 8 for 37 Sermon 10 for 31 Harris 15 for 62 Mixon 10 for 33 Herbert 19 for 97 Gibson 14 for 51 Edmonds 7 for 30 Darrel Williams 19 for 70 Alex Collins 10 for 41 Cook 22 for 86 Darrell Henderson 16 for 55 Montgomery 10 for 42 Latavius Murray 7 for 48 Chubb 17 for 126 Cook 9 for 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts