Jump to content

Random Packer News & Notes


Leader

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, R T said:

It could have been done in January and still spread into that year's cap, so no that is not it. 

As for your 'pretty largely outpaced' comment, that is BS, his contract was 23M APY and Trent Williams signed a contract later that spring for 23.01M APY.  

How many extensions are signed in January? Has there ever been even one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sucks for Dave, and sucks for the 2023 Packers, but this is the best possible situation for the 2024 Packers. LT is our #1 need and will be for sure mocked to us in round 1-2. If Walker locks the position down it opens up a ton of draft flexibility next year. If he doesn't, we know we need to address that position early and often.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packerraymond said:

Sucks for Dave, and sucks for the 2023 Packers, but this is the best possible situation for the 2024 Packers. LT is our #1 need and will be for sure mocked to us in round 1-2. If Walker locks the position down it opens up a ton of draft flexibility next year. If he doesn't, we know we need to address that position early and often.

Yup. I'd imagine LT would have already been fairly high on our wish list going forward. These events just confirm it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packerraymond said:

Sucks for Dave, and sucks for the 2023 Packers, but this is the best possible situation for the 2024 Packers. LT is our #1 need and will be for sure mocked to us in round 1-2. If Walker locks the position down it opens up a ton of draft flexibility next year. If he doesn't, we know we need to address that position early and often.

I think Tom could slide left and be damn good. His body type somewhat seems better suited for LT. I know that means we need a RT. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Packerraymond said:

Sucks for Dave, and sucks for the 2023 Packers, but this is the best possible situation for the 2024 Packers. LT is our #1 need and will be for sure mocked to us in round 1-2. If Walker locks the position down it opens up a ton of draft flexibility next year. If he doesn't, we know we need to address that position early and often.

Yeah I have mixed feelings about it. It's a shame that we'd have to use a top 45 pick on a position we usually draft so well in later rounds. On the other hand, we don't have many "premium" positions of need outside of LT, so we probably were headed that way in the first round anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Refugee said:

69 to IR, not for 4 weeks but 4 games truly hurts. At this point if he plays half of the games it’s a huge win in a **** situation. 

Certainly sucks.  There were some that were in favor of trading him this past offseason.  Window very lilely closed on that option even next offseason and getting a decent return.

Next man up and an opportunity for Walker and Nijman to make a claim to a starting spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...